Biggest City in US by Population 2025 | Statistics & Facts

Biggest City in US by Population

Biggest City by Population in the US 2025

The urban landscape of the United States continues to evolve as cities across the nation experience varying patterns of growth, decline, and transformation. According to the latest U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates released in May 2025, New York City remains the biggest city in the US by population in 2025 with an impressive 8,478,072 residents, maintaining its position as America’s largest city for over two centuries. The metropolis added an extraordinary 87,184 residents between 2023 and 2024, marking the largest numeric population gain of any American city and signaling a strong rebound from pandemic-era losses. Following New York, Los Angeles holds second place with 3,878,704 residents, while Chicago ranks third with 2,721,308 people. These three cities alone account for over 15 million residents, representing approximately 4.4% of the entire U.S. population of 338.7 million people.

The demographic shifts occurring across American cities reflect broader economic, social, and migratory trends that are reshaping the nation’s urban fabric. The top 15 biggest cities in the US by population in 2025 collectively house more than 25.3 million people, with southern cities like Houston (2,390,125), Phoenix (1,673,164), San Antonio (1,526,656), and Dallas (1,326,087) demonstrating remarkable growth momentum. Currently, 9 cities in the United States have populations exceeding 1 million people, a slight decrease from 10 in the 2020 Census as San Jose dipped just below the million-resident threshold at 997,368 people. The southern and western regions are experiencing accelerated urban expansion, with Texas alone hosting 5 cities among the top 15 and claiming 4 of the top 11 spots. Cities of all sizes across all regions showed faster growth and larger gains in 2024 compared to 2023, with the Northeast experiencing population growth after years of steady decline, demonstrating that American cities are experiencing a significant urban renaissance in the post-pandemic era.

Interesting Stats & Facts About Biggest Cities in US by Population 2025

Fact Category Statistic/Detail
Biggest City in US New York City with 8,478,072 residents
Second Largest City Los Angeles with 3,878,704 residents
Third Largest City Chicago with 2,721,308 residents
Cities Over 1 Million 9 cities exceed 1 million population
Largest Numeric Gain New York City added 87,184 residents (2023-2024)
Second Largest Gain Houston added 43,217 residents
Third Largest Gain Los Angeles added 31,276 residents
Fastest Growing City Princeton, Texas at 30.6% growth rate
Most Cities in Top 100 California with 16 cities
Second Most in Top 100 Texas with 13 cities
Total Cities Over 100K 351 cities (up from 337 in 2020)
Densest Large City New York with ~27,000 per sq mile
Fastest Shrinking City San Francisco at -2.6% annual decline
Largest State Capital Phoenix (5th largest overall city)
Total Top 15 Population Over 25.3 million residents combined

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (Released May 2025), World Population Review (2025)

The data presented in this comprehensive table reveals fascinating insights about the biggest cities in the US by population in 2025. New York City’s dominance with 8,478,072 residents represents more than double the population of Los Angeles, the nation’s second-largest city, underscoring the extraordinary scale and density of the New York metropolitan region. The addition of 87,184 residents in just one year marks a dramatic turnaround from the pandemic-era exodus, demonstrating renewed confidence in urban living and the resilience of America’s premier global city. Houston posted the second-largest numeric gain at 43,217 residents, followed by Los Angeles with 31,276, indicating that both established coastal cities and expanding Sun Belt metros are experiencing strong population growth.

The presence of 9 cities exceeding 1 million residents illustrates that while America has numerous large cities, true mega-cities remain relatively rare, with only New York approaching the population scales seen in Asian and Latin American urban centers. California leads with 16 cities in the top 100, followed by Texas with 13 cities, reflecting these states’ enormous populations, geographic size, and economic vitality. The total of 351 cities with populations over 100,000 (up from 337 in 2020) demonstrates continued urbanization trends, while Princeton, Texas’s astonishing 30.6% growth rate exemplifies the explosive expansion occurring in suburban communities surrounding major metropolitan areas. New York’s population density of approximately 27,000 people per square mile far exceeds any other American city, creating unique challenges and opportunities related to transportation, housing, infrastructure, and service delivery. Meanwhile, San Francisco’s -2.6% annual decline reflects the particular challenges facing high-cost coastal cities dealing with remote work migration, housing affordability crises, and quality of life concerns. These statistics collectively paint a picture of dynamic urban change across the biggest cities in the US in 2025, with growth concentrated in affordable, business-friendly regions while some traditional urban centers face demographic headwinds.

Top 15 Biggest Cities in US by Population 2025

Rank City State 2024 Population 2023-2024 Change % Change
1 New York City New York 8,478,072 +87,184 +1.04%
2 Los Angeles California 3,878,704 +31,276 +0.81%
3 Chicago Illinois 2,721,308 +22,164 +0.82%
4 Houston Texas 2,390,125 +43,217 +1.84%
5 Phoenix Arizona 1,673,164 +16,933 +1.02%
6 Philadelphia Pennsylvania 1,573,916 ~+13,000 +0.83%
7 San Antonio Texas 1,526,656 +23,945 +1.59%
8 San Diego California 1,404,452 ~+11,000 +0.79%
9 Dallas Texas 1,326,087 ~+18,500 +1.41%
10 Jacksonville Florida 1,009,833 +16,365 +1.65%
11 Fort Worth Texas 1,008,106 +23,442 +2.38%
12 San Jose California 997,368 +13,634 +1.39%
13 Austin Texas 993,588 ~+12,800 +1.30%
14 Charlotte North Carolina 943,476 +23,423 +2.55%
15 Columbus Ohio 933,263 +12,694 +1.38%

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (Released May 2025)

The top 15 biggest cities in the US by population in 2025 collectively represent America’s most important urban centers, housing over 25.3 million people or approximately 7.5% of the nation’s total population. New York City stands in a category entirely its own, with 8,478,072 residents representing more than 2.2 times the population of Los Angeles and exceeding the entire population of 38 individual states. The city’s remarkable 87,184-person increase between 2023 and 2024 marks the largest numeric gain in decades and signals a decisive end to pandemic-related population losses that saw hundreds of thousands flee to suburbs and other states during 2020-2021. This resurgence reflects renewed job growth, the return of international immigration, housing construction, and younger generations’ preference for urban amenities, culture, and career opportunities available only in America’s largest metropolis.

Los Angeles maintains its position as the nation’s second-largest city with 3,878,704 residents, adding 31,276 people in the past year and demonstrating resilience despite challenges including high housing costs, homelessness, and quality of life concerns. Chicago rounds out the top three with 2,721,308 residents and a gain of 22,164 people, marking a significant reversal after years of population decline that had raised concerns about the Midwest’s largest city. The addition represents Chicago’s first substantial growth in recent years and suggests that more affordable housing compared to coastal cities, combined with strong employment in finance, healthcare, and technology, is attracting new residents.

The most striking pattern in this ranking is the dominance of southern and western cities in terms of growth rates. Texas claims an extraordinary 5 cities in the top 15—Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Fort Worth, and Austin—collectively housing over 7.2 million people and demonstrating growth rates between 1.30% and 2.38%. Houston added 43,217 residents, the second-highest numeric gain nationally, while maintaining affordable housing, no state income tax, and robust energy, healthcare, and aerospace sectors. Fort Worth (+2.38%) and Charlotte (+2.55%) posted the highest growth rates among major cities, reflecting their emergence as business-friendly destinations offering quality of life, job opportunities, and housing affordability that increasingly attract both domestic migrants and international immigrants. Meanwhile, Phoenix surpassed Philadelphia to become the nation’s 5th-largest city, a position Philadelphia had held for generations, symbolizing the ongoing geographic rebalancing of American population toward the Sun Belt. These 15 biggest cities serve as economic engines, cultural centers, and immigrant gateways that fundamentally shape American society, politics, and culture in 2025.

Cities with Largest Numeric Population Gains in US 2025

Rank City State Numeric Gain 2024 Population Growth Rate
1 New York City New York +87,184 8,478,072 +1.04%
2 Houston Texas +43,217 2,390,125 +1.84%
3 Los Angeles California +31,276 3,878,704 +0.81%
4 San Antonio Texas +23,945 1,526,656 +1.59%
5 Fort Worth Texas +23,442 1,008,106 +2.38%
6 Charlotte North Carolina +23,423 943,476 +2.55%
7 Chicago Illinois +22,164 2,721,308 +0.82%
8 Phoenix Arizona +16,933 1,673,164 +1.02%
9 Seattle Washington +16,813 780,995 +2.20%
10 Jacksonville Florida +16,365 1,009,833 +1.65%
11 Miami Florida +16,337 487,014 +3.47%
12 Washington DC District of Columbia +14,926 702,250 +2.17%
13 San Jose California +13,634 997,368 +1.39%
14 Columbus Ohio +12,694 933,263 +1.38%
15 Las Vegas Nevada +12,292 678,922 +1.84%

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (Released May 2025)

The cities with largest numeric population gains in the US during 2025 reveal which metropolitan areas are successfully attracting new residents through job creation, housing development, and quality of life improvements. New York City’s staggering gain of 87,184 residents dwarfs all other cities and represents nearly double the gain of second-place Houston at 43,217 people. This remarkable turnaround follows significant losses during 2020-2021 when remote work, safety concerns, and high costs drove hundreds of thousands to flee. The resurgence reflects multiple factors including the return of international students and workers, robust immigration, strong job growth particularly in technology and finance, massive housing construction in Brooklyn and Queens, and younger generations’ renewed commitment to urban living despite high costs.

Texas cities dominate the rankings with Houston (#2), San Antonio (#4), and Fort Worth (#5) all adding over 23,000 residents each, while Dallas and Austin (not shown but also in top 20) continue expanding rapidly. The state’s appeal stems from no state income tax, relatively affordable housing compared to coastal cities, robust job markets in energy, technology, healthcare, and logistics, business-friendly regulations, and warm weather. Houston has emerged as one of America’s most diverse cities and a major destination for both domestic migrants from California and the Northeast as well as international immigrants from Latin America, Asia, and Africa.

Charlotte adding 23,423 residents (+2.55% growth) exemplifies the rise of secondary southern cities that offer urban amenities, strong banking and finance sectors, lower costs than major metros, and quality of life that appeals to young professionals and families. Miami’s gain of 16,337 represents a 3.47% growth rate, the highest among cities in this ranking, driven by an influx of wealthy individuals, remote workers, international buyers, and businesses relocating from higher-tax states, though this rapid growth has created affordability challenges for longtime residents. Washington DC adding 14,926 residents and Seattle gaining 16,813 demonstrate that some high-cost cities continue attracting residents through strong labor markets, particularly in government, technology, and professional services. Notably, Chicago appears at #7 with 22,164 new residents, marking a significant reversal of the city’s decade-long population decline and suggesting that more affordable large cities in the Midwest may be experiencing renaissance as people reconsider Sun Belt destinations amid rising costs and climate concerns. These numeric gains across diverse cities in 2025 indicate that urban America is thriving with growth distributed across regions, city sizes, and economic sectors.

Fastest Growing Cities in US by Percentage 2025

Rank City State Growth Rate 2024 Population Numeric Gain
1 Princeton Texas +30.6% 37,019 ~+8,700
2 Fulshear Texas +26.9% 54,629 ~+11,600
3 Leesburg Florida +18.5% 37,815 ~+5,900
4 Celina Texas +18.2% 51,661 ~+8,000
5 Anna Texas +14.6% 31,986 ~+4,100
6 Haines City Florida +12.1% 42,073 ~+4,500
7 Foley Alabama +12.0% 28,043 ~+3,000
8 Fate Texas +11.4% 27,467 ~+2,800
9 Rosemount Minnesota +10.6% 30,581 ~+2,900
10 Garner North Carolina +10.4% 39,345 ~+3,700
11 Melissa Texas +10.0% 26,194 ~+2,400
12 Sugar Hill Georgia +9.5% 28,598 ~+2,500
13 Hutto Texas +9.4% 42,661 ~+3,700
14 Leland North Carolina +9.4% 34,451 ~+3,000
15 Erie Colorado +9.2% 38,594 ~+3,200

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (Released May 2025)

The fastest growing cities in the US by percentage in 2025 are predominantly smaller suburban communities experiencing explosive expansion as major metropolitan areas sprawl outward. Princeton, Texas leads the nation with an extraordinary 30.6% growth rate, adding approximately 8,700 residents in a single year to reach 37,019 people. Located in the rapidly expanding Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan corridor, Princeton exemplifies the exurban boom occurring around Texas’s major cities as families and businesses seek more space, newer housing, better schools, and lower costs while maintaining access to urban job centers. The town has transformed from a sleepy rural community into a thriving suburb with new residential developments, retail centers, and infrastructure investments attracting thousands of new residents annually.

Texas dominates the fastest-growing cities list with 7 of the top 15 spots, including Fulshear, Celina, Anna, Fate, Melissa, and Hutto, all posting double-digit growth rates exceeding 9%. These communities surround Houston, Dallas, and Austin, benefiting from those metro areas’ robust economies while offering single-family homes, good schools, and small-town character increasingly sought by families with children. Fulshear, near Houston, grew 26.9% to reach 54,629 residents, while Celina, north of Dallas, expanded 18.2% to 51,661 people, demonstrating that even communities approaching 50,000 population can sustain extraordinary growth rates when positioned in high-demand corridors.

Florida claims two spots with Leesburg (+18.5%) and Haines City (+12.1%), reflecting the Sunshine State’s continued appeal to retirees, remote workers, and families seeking warm weather, no state income tax, and growing job markets. North Carolina appears twice with Garner and Leland, both growing over 9%, as the Research Triangle and coastal regions attract technology workers, military personnel, and retirees. Notably, only one city from the Northeast—Rosemount, Minnesota at +10.6%—appears in the top 15, highlighting how growth is concentrated in the South and West. These fastest-growing communities tend to share characteristics including: proximity to major employment centers, available land for development, newer infrastructure and schools, lower taxes and costs than central cities, and family-oriented environments. However, this rapid growth creates challenges including traffic congestion, school overcrowding, infrastructure strain, and the need to maintain community character while accommodating thousands of new residents. The explosive growth rates in these cities during 2025 underscore the ongoing suburbanization and exurbanization trends reshaping American settlement patterns.

Most Populous Cities by Region in US 2025

Region Largest City Population 2nd Largest Population 3rd Largest Population
Northeast New York City, NY 8,478,072 Philadelphia, PA 1,573,916 Boston, MA ~675,000
South Houston, TX 2,390,125 San Antonio, TX 1,526,656 Dallas, TX 1,326,087
Midwest Chicago, IL 2,721,308 Columbus, OH 933,263 Indianapolis, IN ~895,000
West Los Angeles, CA 3,878,704 Phoenix, AZ 1,673,164 San Diego, CA 1,404,452
Pacific Los Angeles, CA 3,878,704 San Diego, CA 1,404,452 San Jose, CA 997,368
Mountain Phoenix, AZ 1,673,164 Denver, CO ~735,000 Las Vegas, NV 678,922
South Atlantic Jacksonville, FL 1,009,833 Charlotte, NC 943,476 Washington DC 702,250
East South Central Nashville, TN ~715,000 Memphis, TN ~628,000 Birmingham, AL ~196,000

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (Released May 2025), Census Bureau Regional Classifications

The most populous cities by region in the US during 2025 reveal striking disparities in urban development patterns across different parts of the country. The Northeast is dominated overwhelmingly by New York City with 8,478,072 residents, which alone contains more people than the three largest Midwest cities combined and exceeds the population of 39 individual states. Philadelphia at 1,573,916 residents ranks second in the Northeast but sixth nationally, while Boston with approximately 675,000 demonstrates how the Northeast, despite its historical importance and economic power, has relatively fewer large cities compared to other regions, with population concentrated in the massive New York metropolitan area that extends across multiple states.

The South showcases remarkable urban diversity with three Texas cities—Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas—comprising the region’s three largest, collectively housing over 5.2 million people. The South’s explosive growth over recent decades has created numerous large cities, with 8 of the 15 biggest US cities located in southern states. The region benefits from warm weather, no or low state income taxes in key states, business-friendly regulations, affordable housing, and booming industries including energy, technology, healthcare, and logistics. Houston’s position as the South’s largest city with 2,390,125 residents reflects its role as an energy capital, port city, medical center, and increasingly diverse immigrant gateway.

The Midwest is anchored by Chicago’s 2,721,308 residents, making it the region’s only city exceeding 2 million and one of only three cities nationally in that category. Columbus, Ohio at 933,263 ranks second, having grown steadily through its role as state capital, university town, and diversified economy. The Midwest contains fewer of the nation’s largest cities than the South or West, reflecting decades of slower growth, industrial decline in some areas, and out-migration to warmer regions, though recent data suggests a potential reversal as some Midwest cities offer affordability and quality of life increasingly attractive to families and businesses.

The West is led by Los Angeles at 3,878,704, the nation’s second-largest city, followed by Phoenix at 1,673,164 and San Diego at 1,404,452, demonstrating the region’s extraordinary urban growth over the past century. The Pacific Coast and Mountain West subregions show distinct patterns, with California dominating the Pacific with three cities (Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose) exceeding 900,000 residents, while the Mountain West is led by Phoenix but features generally smaller cities spread across vast distances. These regional patterns across US cities in 2025 reflect historical settlement, economic opportunities, climate, and migration trends that continue shaping where Americans choose to live and work.

Population Density Rankings of Major US Cities 2025

Rank City State Population Land Area (sq mi) Density (per sq mi)
1 New York City New York 8,478,072 ~302 ~28,080
2 San Francisco California ~808,000 ~47 ~17,200
3 Boston Massachusetts ~675,000 ~48 ~14,060
4 Santa Ana California ~310,000 ~27 ~11,480
5 Chicago Illinois 2,721,308 ~227 ~11,990
6 Philadelphia Pennsylvania 1,573,916 ~134 ~11,750
7 Miami Florida 487,014 ~36 ~13,530
8 Washington DC District of Columbia 702,250 ~61 ~11,510
9 Long Beach California ~455,000 ~50 ~9,100
10 Los Angeles California 3,878,704 ~469 ~8,270

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates, World Population Review Density Calculations (2025)

The population density rankings of major US cities in 2025 reveal dramatic variations in urban development patterns, with New York City standing alone as America’s only true high-density metropolis. With approximately 28,080 people per square mile across 302 square miles of land area, New York’s density approaches that of major Asian and European cities, creating a unique urban environment requiring extensive public transportation, high-rise residential and commercial buildings, and intensive land use. No other American city comes close to this density, with second-place San Francisco at approximately 17,200 per square mile representing only 61% of New York’s density despite San Francisco’s own reputation as a dense, vertical city.

Boston ranks third at roughly 14,060 per square mile, followed by Miami at 13,530, Chicago at 11,990, and Philadelphia at 11,750, all representing traditional older cities built before automobile dominance where compact development, public transit, and walkability were necessities. These cities feature dense urban cores, historic neighborhoods, and relatively limited sprawl compared to newer western and southern cities. The density creates advantages including shorter commutes, lower per-capita infrastructure costs, vibrant street life, and lower carbon emissions, but also challenges including higher housing costs, noise, limited green space, and competition for scarce land.

In stark contrast, many rapidly growing southern and western cities exhibit far lower densities, with cities like Houston averaging only 3,500 per square mile, Phoenix around 3,200, and Dallas approximately 3,900. These sprawling metropolitan areas developed primarily after World War II when automobiles dominated, land was cheap and abundant, and suburban single-family home developments became the norm. The low density creates challenges including traffic congestion, higher infrastructure costs per capita, social isolation, environmental impacts, and difficulty supporting public transportation, but offers residents more space, newer housing, yards, and parking—amenities highly valued by families.

The density patterns across major US cities in 2025 fundamentally shape quality of life, sustainability, housing affordability, transportation options, and urban character. Dense cities like New York can support extensive subway systems, walkable neighborhoods, and diverse street-level retail, while sprawling cities require automobile dependence but offer more personal space and housing types. As climate change and sustainability concerns intensify, the debate over optimal urban density continues, with dense cities offering environmental advantages through lower per-capita emissions and land consumption, while lower-density cities provide affordability and space increasingly sought by families and remote workers who can live anywhere.

State Capitals Among Biggest US Cities 2025

Rank City State Population National Rank Capital Since
1 Phoenix Arizona 1,673,164 #5 1912
2 Austin Texas 993,588 #13 1839
3 Columbus Ohio 933,263 #15 1816
4 Indianapolis Indiana ~895,000 #16 1825
5 Denver Colorado ~735,000 #19 1876
6 Oklahoma City Oklahoma ~709,000 #20 1910
7 Nashville Tennessee ~715,000 #21 1843
8 Boston Massachusetts ~675,000 #23 1630
9 Sacramento California ~530,000 #34 1854
10 Atlanta Georgia ~510,000 #37 1868
11 Raleigh North Carolina ~490,000 #40 1792
12 Honolulu Hawaii ~350,000 #54 1959
13 St. Paul Minnesota ~315,000 #62 1849
14 Lincoln Nebraska ~295,000 #68 1867
15 Madison Wisconsin ~280,000 #73 1838

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (Released May 2025), National Conference of State Legislatures

The presence of state capitals among the biggest US cities in 2025 demonstrates that political importance and urban size often align, though not always. Phoenix stands as the largest state capital and the 5th-largest city nationally with 1,673,164 residents, representing a dramatic shift from historical patterns when most state capitals were smaller cities chosen for their central geographic location rather than economic importance. Phoenix’s emergence as both capital and major metropolis reflects Arizona’s explosive 20th and 21st-century growth, transforming the city from a desert outpost into a thriving Sun Belt powerhouse with diverse industries including technology, aerospace, healthcare, and tourism. The city’s role as capital provides stable government employment, political influence, and infrastructure investment that complement its economic vitality.

Austin ranks as the nation’s 13th-largest city with 993,588 residents and exemplifies the modern dynamic capital, having emerged as a major technology hub often called “Silicon Hills,” attracting companies like Tesla, Oracle, and thousands of startups alongside its traditional government and university functions. Columbus, Ohio at 933,263 (#15 nationally) has similarly leveraged its capital status to build a diversified economy including government, education (Ohio State University), insurance, healthcare, and technology. Indianapolis (#16) and Denver (#19) represent other major capitals that have grown into significant metropolitan centers, with Denver’s 735,000 residents reflecting Colorado’s population boom and the city’s role as the Mountain West’s premier urban center.

However, many of America’s largest cities are not state capitals, with the most dramatic examples being New York City (capital is Albany), Los Angeles (capital is Sacramento), Chicago (capital is Springfield), Houston (capital is Austin), and Philadelphia (capital is Harrisburg). This pattern reflects historical decisions to locate capitals in more central, neutral locations away from dominant commercial cities, or in Philadelphia’s case, a later move of the capital. Among the top 100 cities, only 17 are state capitals, demonstrating that political and economic importance often diverge. Boston remains an exception as both the capital and dominant city of Massachusetts, while smaller capitals like Boise (#77), Richmond (#98), and others in the top 100 show that even modest-sized capitals can rank among the nation’s larger cities. The varying sizes of state capitals across the US in 2025 reflect diverse state histories, geographic factors, and the sometimes intentional separation of political power from economic dominance to ensure broader representation across state territories.

Cities Experiencing Population Decline in US 2025

Rank City State Population Annual Change Primary Decline Factors
1 San Francisco California ~808,000 -2.6% High costs, remote work, crime concerns
2 Oakland California ~430,000 -1.8% Affordability, crime, business closures
3 Long Beach California ~455,000 -1.3% Cost of living, housing shortage
4 Santa Ana California ~310,000 -1.2% Housing costs, economic challenges
5 Stockton California ~320,000 -1.1% Economic struggles, affordability
6 Sacramento California ~530,000 -0.9% State government consolidation, costs
7 Fremont California ~230,000 -0.8% Tech industry volatility, high costs
8 Berkeley California ~120,000 -0.7% Student population changes, costs
9 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania ~300,000 -0.5% Aging population, slow growth
10 St. Louis Missouri ~285,000 -0.4% Economic decline, crime concerns

Data Source: World Population Review 2025, U.S. Census Bureau Estimates Analysis

The cities experiencing population decline in the US during 2025 are concentrated overwhelmingly in California, with 8 of the top 10 declining cities located in the Golden State, reflecting the particular challenges facing high-cost coastal regions in the post-pandemic era. San Francisco leads all declining cities at -2.6% annually, having lost approximately 60,000 residents since 2020, a dramatic reversal for a city long synonymous with innovation, wealth, and desirability. The decline stems from multiple converging factors: astronomical housing costs with median home prices exceeding $1.4 million, soaring rents averaging over $3,000 for one-bedroom apartments, widespread adoption of remote work enabling tech workers to relocate to cheaper regions, visible homelessness and drug use affecting quality of life, retail vacancies downtown, and concerns about crime and street conditions.

Oakland and other Bay Area cities face similar challenges, with the -1.8% decline reflecting unaffordable housing, business closures, and safety concerns that have prompted middle-class families and businesses to relocate to Texas, Arizona, Nevada, and other states offering lower costs and business-friendly environments. The exodus of tech workers and companies during the pandemic continues, with major employers maintaining remote work policies that enable employees to live anywhere, dramatically reducing California cities’ competitive advantages. Sacramento, despite being the state capital, faces -0.9% decline as state government consolidates operations and high costs drive residents to neighboring counties or out of state entirely.

Outside California, Pittsburgh and St. Louis represent traditional Rust Belt cities experiencing slower declines of -0.4% to -0.5%, reflecting decades-long patterns of population loss following industrial decline, though both have stabilized considerably compared to peak losses in the 1970s-1990s. These cities face aging populations, limited job growth in some sectors, crime concerns in certain neighborhoods, and competition from Sun Belt cities offering warmer weather and economic opportunity. However, both have developed “eds and meds” economies based on universities and healthcare, arts and cultural scenes, and affordable historic housing that appeals to some residents.

The concentration of declining cities in California during 2025 raises critical questions about housing policy, taxation, regulation, homelessness, and governance that have made the nation’s most prosperous state increasingly unaffordable for middle-class residents. While California’s overall population remains massive at over 39 million, the out-migration of hundreds of thousands annually to Texas, Florida, Arizona, and other states represents a significant demographic shift. Some analysts argue this represents market correction after unsustainable growth, while others warn of a longer-term crisis if California cannot address housing affordability, cost of living, and quality of life concerns driving residents away. The population declines in these cities in 2025 may prove temporary as housing costs moderate and quality of life improves, or may represent the beginning of sustained shifts that reshape American urban hierarchies for decades to come.

Economic and Demographic Characteristics of Top 10 Cities 2025

City Population Median HH Income Poverty Rate Unemployment College Degree+
New York City 8,478,072 ~$72,000 ~16.5% ~5.8% ~40%
Los Angeles 3,878,704 ~$71,000 ~18.2% ~6.2% ~35%
Chicago 2,721,308 ~$65,000 ~17.8% ~6.5% ~38%
Houston 2,390,125 ~$56,000 ~19.4% ~5.9% ~32%
Phoenix 1,673,164 ~$68,000 ~15.2% ~5.4% ~31%
Philadelphia 1,573,916 ~$53,000 ~23.1% ~7.2% ~32%
San Antonio 1,526,656 ~$55,000 ~17.6% ~5.7% ~28%
San Diego 1,404,452 ~$89,000 ~12.3% ~5.1% ~45%
Dallas 1,326,087 ~$60,000 ~18.9% ~5.6% ~34%
Jacksonville 1,009,833 ~$63,000 ~14.8% ~5.3% ~30%

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2023, Bureau of Labor Statistics 2024

The economic and demographic characteristics of the top 10 cities in 2025 reveal substantial variations in prosperity, education, and economic opportunity across America’s largest urban centers. San Diego leads in median household income at approximately $89,000, reflecting the city’s concentration of high-wage military, biotech, technology, and tourism jobs, along with its highly educated population where 45% hold bachelor’s degrees or higher—the highest rate among the top 10 cities. San Diego also posts the lowest poverty rate at 12.3% and one of the lowest unemployment rates at 5.1%, demonstrating strong economic health despite California’s high cost of living. The city’s military installations, major research universities, and growing biotech cluster create stable, high-wage employment that sustains relative prosperity.

New York City and Los Angeles show similar median incomes around $71,000-$72,000, remarkable given these cities’ extraordinary costs of living where this income level provides only moderate comfort. Both cities feature extreme inequality with pockets of immense wealth alongside concentrated poverty exceeding 16-18%, reflecting the dual economies of finance, technology, entertainment, and professional services coexisting with large immigrant, service worker, and struggling populations. New York’s 40% college degree attainment reflects its role as a global education and professional hub, though this masks significant disparities between highly educated professionals and working-class communities.

In contrast, Philadelphia shows the lowest median income at approximately $53,000 and the highest poverty rate at 23.1% among the top 10 cities, reflecting persistent economic challenges despite the city’s rich history, universities, and cultural assets. Philadelphia struggles with post-industrial decline, population loss in some neighborhoods, underfunded schools, and concentrations of poverty that limit economic mobility. The 7.2% unemployment rate significantly exceeds most peer cities, indicating labor market weakness requiring policy attention. San Antonio and Houston show moderate incomes around $55,000-$56,000 with poverty rates near 17-19%, reflecting Texas’s low-wage service economy, lack of state income tax offset by limited public services, and large immigrant populations working in construction, hospitality, and service sectors.

Educational attainment varies from San Diego’s 45% with degrees down to San Antonio’s 28%, indicating different economic structures and opportunities. Cities with higher degree attainment (New York, Chicago, San Diego) generally offer more professional employment, innovation economies, and higher incomes, while cities with lower rates depend more on construction, manufacturing, logistics, and services. The unemployment rates across all top 10 cities remain relatively moderate between 5.1% and 7.2%, reflecting generally healthy urban labor markets in 2025, though rates remain elevated compared to national averages and mask significant disparities by race, education, and neighborhood. These economic characteristics across the biggest US cities in 2025 fundamentally shape opportunity, mobility, and quality of life for tens of millions of Americans living in these urban centers.

Metropolitan Statistical Areas vs City Proper Populations 2025

Metropolitan Area MSA Population Largest City City Population City % of MSA
New York-Newark-Jersey City ~19.5 million New York City 8,478,072 43.5%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim ~13.2 million Los Angeles 3,878,704 29.4%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ~9.4 million Chicago 2,721,308 28.9%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington ~8.1 million Dallas 1,326,087 16.4%
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land ~7.5 million Houston 2,390,125 31.9%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington ~6.2 million Philadelphia 1,573,916 25.4%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta ~6.3 million Atlanta ~510,000 8.1%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler ~5.1 million Phoenix 1,673,164 32.8%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria ~6.4 million Washington DC 702,250 11.0%
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley ~4.7 million San Francisco ~808,000 17.2%

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Metropolitan Statistical Area Estimates 2024, City Population Estimates Vintage 2024

The comparison between metropolitan statistical areas and city proper populations in 2025 reveals critical distinctions between legal city boundaries and actual functional urban regions. The New York-Newark-Jersey City MSA encompasses approximately 19.5 million people across portions of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut, making it by far the nation’s largest metropolitan region—nearly 50% larger than Los Angeles and more than double Chicago’s metro population. However, New York City proper accounts for 43.5% of this metro population, the highest percentage among major metros, reflecting the city’s unusual consolidation of five counties into a single municipality and its historic density that concentrated population within city limits rather than sprawling suburbs.

In stark contrast, Atlanta demonstrates extreme fragmentation, with the city proper housing only 510,000 residents while the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta MSA contains 6.3 million people—meaning Atlanta city accounts for merely 8.1% of its metro population. This reflects Atlanta’s history of suburban sprawl, municipal fragmentation with dozens of independent suburban cities, and resistance to annexation that left the central city relatively small while the functional metropolitan region expanded enormously. Similar patterns appear in Washington DC (11.0% of metro), Dallas (16.4%), and San Francisco (17.2%), where the central city represents a small fraction of the broader metropolitan economy and population.

The disparity matters enormously for governance, taxation, and services. Cities like Houston and Phoenix, which account for 31.9% and 32.8% of their metro populations respectively, can capture broader tax bases through aggressive annexation policies that incorporate growing suburban areas. Texas’s relatively permissive annexation laws enabled Houston and other Texas cities to expand boundaries and maintain relevance, while many northern and eastern cities face state-imposed annexation restrictions that trapped them within 19th or early 20th-century boundaries even as population spread to suburbs. This creates fiscal stress when central cities must maintain infrastructure, provide services, and address poverty while wealthier residents live in independent suburbs paying no city taxes.

The metro-to-city population ratios across major areas in 2025 also affect political representation and resources. Metropolitan statistical areas better capture actual urban regions for economic and planning purposes, yet political power, media coverage, and public attention focus on city-proper populations, sometimes distorting perceptions of urban size and importance. For instance, while Phoenix city (1.67 million) substantially exceeds Philadelphia city (1.57 million), the Philadelphia MSA (6.2 million) significantly exceeds the Phoenix MSA (5.1 million), indicating Philadelphia remains a larger functional economic region despite Phoenix’s larger municipal boundaries. Understanding these distinctions between cities and metros in 2025 is essential for accurate urban analysis, policy development, and resource allocation.

The trajectory of the biggest cities in the US by population in 2025 points toward continued growth concentrated in southern and western regions, potential renaissance in select older cities, and ongoing challenges for high-cost coastal metros struggling with affordability and quality of life concerns. The remarkable turnaround in cities like New York (adding 87,184 residents), Chicago (gaining 22,164), and Washington DC (up 14,926) suggests that dense, transit-oriented, culturally rich cities are experiencing renewed appeal after pandemic-era uncertainty, particularly among younger generations valuing urban amenities, diversity, and career opportunities. The sustained expansion of Texas cities—with Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Fort Worth, and Austin collectively adding over 120,000 residents annually—demonstrates that low-tax, business-friendly environments with affordable housing and robust job growth will continue attracting both domestic migrants and international immigrants seeking economic opportunity.

However, significant challenges loom for the urban future. The explosive growth rates in suburban communities like Princeton, Texas (+30.6%), Fulshear (+26.9%), and dozens of similar exurbs reflect continued American preference for single-family homes, yards, and automobile-oriented development that creates long-term sustainability concerns including traffic congestion, infrastructure costs, water scarcity in arid regions, and carbon emissions. The persistent decline of San Francisco (-2.6%) and other California cities raises questions about whether the nation’s most economically productive regions can solve housing affordability crises and quality of life concerns, or whether high costs will continue driving middle-class exodus that undermines these cities’ long-term competitiveness. The stark economic disparities revealed in cities like Philadelphia (23.1% poverty) alongside prosperous San Diego (12.3% poverty) demonstrate that not all large cities provide equitable opportunity, requiring targeted interventions in education, workforce development, infrastructure, and governance. Climate change poses existential threats to coastal cities facing sea-level rise and hurricanes, while southwestern cities like Phoenix and Las Vegas confront water scarcity that may ultimately limit growth. As the biggest cities in America navigate 2025 and beyond, their success in addressing housing affordability, infrastructure investment, climate adaptation, economic inclusion, and quality of life will determine not just urban futures but the prosperity and sustainability of the entire nation, as cities remain the engines of innovation, culture, and economic growth that shape American society.

Disclaimer: This research report is compiled from publicly available sources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given as to the completeness or reliability of the information. We accept no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages of any kind arising from the use of this report.