Insurrection Act Statistics in the US 2026 | Key Facts

Insurrection Act in US 2026

The Insurrection Act stands as one of the most powerful emergency authorities available to the President of the United States, granting sweeping powers to deploy federal military forces domestically. As of January 2026, this centuries-old legislation remains a focal point of national debate, with President Donald Trump threatening its invocation in Minnesota amid protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. The Act, which traces its origins to the Calling Forth Act of 1792 and was formally codified in 1807, authorizes the President to federalize National Guard units and deploy active-duty military personnel to suppress insurrection, rebellion, or domestic violence. This extraordinary power serves as a statutory exception to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which generally prohibits military involvement in civilian law enforcement.

Throughout American history, the Insurrection Act has been invoked during pivotal moments that tested the nation’s commitment to federal authority, civil rights, and public order. From suppressing the Ku Klux Klan during Reconstruction to enforcing school desegregation during the Civil Rights Movement, the Act has shaped critical chapters of American democracy. As of 2026, the legislation faces unprecedented scrutiny due to repeated threats of invocation by the current administration, spurring bipartisan calls for comprehensive reform. With 33 years having passed since its last use in 1992, the United States is experiencing the longest period without an invocation in the Act’s entire history, making current developments particularly significant for understanding executive power and civil liberties in modern America.

Interesting Facts and Latest Statistics Regarding Insurrection Act in the US 2026

Data Source: Brennan Center for Justice, U.S. Congress Library, Historical Records

The statistical landscape of the Insurrection Act reveals a pattern of increasingly rare usage throughout American history, with modern presidents exercising exceptional restraint in deploying military forces domestically. The 30 documented invocations across 230 years translate to an average of one invocation every 7.7 years, though actual usage has become dramatically less frequent in recent decades. The 1992 Los Angeles riots remain the most recent and one of the most devastating incidents requiring federal military intervention, resulting in 63 deaths, 2,383 injuries, and approximately $1 billion in property damage across six days of civil unrest. President George H.W. Bush’s decision to invoke the Act came at the request of California Governor Pete Wilson, highlighting the most common pathway for invocation where state authorities acknowledge their inability to restore order independently.

Historical analysis shows that 15 different presidents have utilized this emergency authority, with President Ulysses S. Grant holding the record for most invocations at 8 separate occasions during the Reconstruction Era to combat Ku Klux Klan violence and protect the civil rights of formerly enslaved people. As of January 2026, President Trump has threatened invocation in Minnesota following protests against ICE operations but has not formally activated the authority, maintaining the 33-year hiatus that represents the longest stretch without use in the Act’s entire history. The introduction of two major reform bills in 2025 (H.R. 4076 in the House and S. 2070 in the Senate) reflects growing bipartisan concern about the Act’s vague language and lack of meaningful checks on presidential power, with proposed reforms including mandatory Congressional consultation, clearer definitional triggers, time limitations of 7 days without Congressional approval, and provisions for judicial review of executive actions under the statute.

Historical Invocations of the Insurrection Act in the US by Century Through 2026

Data Source: Brennan Center for Justice, Congressional Research Service, Wikipedia List of Invocations

The chronological breakdown of Insurrection Act invocations reveals distinct patterns reflecting the evolving nature of domestic crises and federal responses throughout American history. The Reconstruction Era witnessed the most concentrated use of the Act, with President Ulysses S. Grant invoking it 8 times primarily to combat organized white supremacist violence by groups like the Ku Klux Klan and to protect the constitutional rights of newly freed African Americans in former Confederate states. This period established crucial legal precedent for using federal military power to enforce civil rights against state resistance, a precedent that would prove essential during the next major cluster of invocations.

The Civil Rights Era of the 1950s and 1960s saw 6 invocations by three presidents—Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson—all deployed to enforce federal court orders for school desegregation and protect civil rights activists against violent opposition from state and local authorities. President Eisenhower’s 1957 intervention in Little Rock, Arkansas, President Kennedy’s 3 separate invocations in Mississippi and Alabama to enforce university integration, and President Johnson’s 1965 protection of marchers traveling from Selma to Montgomery represent the most recent instances where presidents invoked the Act without state consent to protect constitutional rights. The contemporary period from 1992 to 2026 marks an unprecedented 33-year gap without any invocation, reflecting either improved state and local law enforcement capabilities, changed political calculus regarding military domestic deployment, or simply the absence of crises severe enough to warrant federal military intervention on American soil.

Deaths and Casualties During Insurrection Act Deployments in the US from 1992-2026

Data Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Historical Archive, Britannica Encyclopedia, Congressional Records

The 1992 Los Angeles riots stand as the most devastating civil disturbance requiring federal military intervention in modern American history, with casualty figures that underscore the severity of the crisis that prompted President George H.W. Bush to invoke the Insurrection Act on May 1, 1992. The six-day uprising resulted in 63 confirmed deaths, though some estimates place the toll as high as 64 individuals, with victims including civilians of all races, law enforcement personnel, and individuals caught in crossfire situations. The 2,383 documented injuries encompassed beating victims, gunshot wounds, and injuries sustained during property damage and arson incidents, while the scope of arrests exceeded 12,000 individuals charged with looting, arson, assault, and related offenses. The property damage totaled approximately $1 billion, with over 7,000 fires destroying or damaging more than 3,100 businesses primarily in South Central Los Angeles and surrounding areas.

The riots erupted on April 29, 1992, within hours of the acquittal of four Los Angeles Police Department officers charged in the beating of Rodney King, an African American motorist whose brutal arrest had been captured on videotape. California Governor Pete Wilson requested federal assistance on May 1, leading President Bush to issue Executive Order 12804 invoking the Insurrection Act and federalizing the California Army National Guard while authorizing deployment of active-duty Army and Marine Corps personnel under Operation Garden Plot. The 33-year period from 1992 to 2026 without any subsequent invocations represents not only the longest stretch in the Act’s history but also a period without comparable casualties from domestic military deployments, though this statistic reflects the absence of invocations rather than the absence of civil unrest or potential crises that some administrations have considered addressing through military force.

Presidents Who Invoked the Insurrection Act in the US by Administration Through 2026

Data Source: Brennan Center for Justice, National Archives, Congressional Historical Records

Presidential use of the Insurrection Act reflects both the political dynamics of different eras and the varying thresholds individual executives have applied when considering domestic military deployment. President Ulysses S. Grant holds the clear record with 8 invocations during his two terms from 1869-1877, primarily concentrated in Southern states where he deployed federal troops to protect African Americans from Ku Klux Klan terrorism and enforce Reconstruction policies guaranteeing civil rights. Grant’s frequent use established important precedents for federal intervention to protect constitutional rights against state resistance, though it also generated significant political backlash that contributed to the eventual passage of the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878.

Three presidents during the Civil Rights Era invoked the Act to enforce school desegregation and protect activists: President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock Central High School in 1957, President John F. Kennedy invoked it 3 times between 1962-1963 for university integration in Mississippi and Alabama, and President Lyndon B. Johnson used it twice to protect civil rights marchers in Alabama in 1965 and quell the Detroit riots in 1967. These represented the last instances where presidents deployed military forces without state consent to enforce federal civil rights protections. Since President George H.W. Bush’s 1992 invocation during the Los Angeles riots, five subsequent presidents spanning 33 years have refrained from using the Act despite various domestic crises, though President Trump has repeatedly threatened invocation during both his first term (2017-2021) regarding protests and his second term (2025-present) regarding immigration enforcement operations, marking January 2026 as a critical moment for potential changes to this historical pattern.

Civil Rights Era Invocations of the Insurrection Act in the US 1954-1968

Data Source: National Archives, JFK Presidential Library, Brennan Center for Justice

The Civil Rights Era represents the most concentrated and purposeful use of the Insurrection Act to advance constitutional equality, with presidents deploying federal military forces to overcome violent state resistance to court-ordered desegregation. President Eisenhower’s 1957 deployment of 1,000 paratroopers from the legendary 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, marked the first use of federal troops to enforce civil rights in the 20th century, sending a powerful message that the federal government would uphold the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision regardless of state opposition. The dramatic scene of battle-hardened soldiers escorting nine African American students into Central High School while segregationist Governor Orval Faubus mobilized the Arkansas National Guard to block integration became an iconic moment demonstrating federal supremacy in protecting constitutional rights.

President John F. Kennedy invoked the Act 3 separate times during his brief presidency, each instance involving Southern universities attempting to maintain racial segregation in defiance of federal court orders. The September 1962 integration of the University of Mississippi by James Meredith required over 2,000 federal troops after riots erupted on campus, resulting in 2 deaths and hundreds of injuries before order was restored. Kennedy’s subsequent 1963 invocations in Alabama involved federalizing the state’s National Guard to enforce desegregation at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa and Birmingham schools. President Lyndon B. Johnson’s March 1965 invocation to protect approximately 5,000 civil rights activists marching from Selma to Montgomery represented the last time a president deployed military forces without state consent specifically to protect constitutional rights, federalizing 1,900 Alabama National Guard troops who had been mobilized by the governor to oppose the march. Johnson’s 1967 Detroit deployment of 4,700 paratroopers responded to massive urban riots that killed 43 people, marking a shift from civil rights enforcement to civil order restoration that would characterize subsequent invocations.

Property Damage and Economic Impact of Insurrection Act Deployments in the US 1989-1992

Data Source: Los Angeles Fire Department, Britannica Encyclopedia, Los Angeles Webster Commission

The economic devastation of the 1992 Los Angeles riots stands unparalleled in modern American civil disturbances requiring federal military intervention, with the $1 billion in property damage (approximately $2.2 billion in 2026 dollars when adjusted for inflation) representing one of the costliest urban crises in U.S. history. The destruction encompassed over 1,100 buildings either damaged or completely destroyed across approximately 51 square miles of South Central Los Angeles and surrounding neighborhoods, with 3,100 businesses experiencing looting, arson, or structural damage that forced many to close permanently. The over 7,000 fires reported during the six-day period overwhelmed local firefighting capabilities, with crews often unable to reach burning structures due to ongoing violence and civil disorder, resulting in entire commercial blocks being reduced to ruins.

The long-term economic impact extended far beyond the immediate destruction, with many neighborhoods experiencing business flight, reduced property values, and persistent unemployment that lasted years after order was restored. Koreatown suffered particularly severe losses, with Korean American business owners losing an estimated $400 million of the total damage, leading to the formation of community defense organizations and lasting inter-ethnic tensions. Insurance claims processing took months, and many businesses either lacked adequate coverage or faced insurers who became insolvent due to the unprecedented volume of claims. The 1989 Hurricane Hugo deployment to the U.S. Virgin Islands, while significant for being President Bush’s first Insurrection Act invocation, resulted in substantially less quantified property damage directly attributable to the civil disorder (as opposed to hurricane damage itself), with federal troops primarily deployed to prevent looting of storm-damaged businesses rather than respond to destruction from civil unrest comparable to the 1992 Los Angeles catastrophe.

Reform Proposals for the Insurrection Act in the US 2025-2026

Data Source: U.S. Congress Library, American Law Institute, Brennan Center for Justice

The 2025 reform efforts represent the most serious Congressional attempt to modernize the Insurrection Act since its last substantive amendment in 1871, driven by concerns about potential abuse of executive power and the need for updated guardrails reflecting 21st-century governance. Both H.R. 4076 and S. 2070 share core objectives of narrowing the vague triggering language that currently allows deployment for “any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy,” terms that legal scholars argue could theoretically encompass ordinary protests or minor disturbances. The proposed 7-day time limitation without Congressional approval represents a significant check on presidential authority, requiring legislative branch consent for extended military deployments domestically while preserving executive ability to respond rapidly to genuine emergencies.

The Senate version with 22 co-sponsors demonstrates substantial Democratic support for reform, though the Republican-controlled Congress as of 2026 has not advanced either bill beyond introduction stage, and prospects for passage remain uncertain given partisan divisions over executive power and immigration enforcement. The American Law Institute’s April 2024 principles brought together former officials including a retired White House Counsel, a former Attorney General, and military legal experts to propose bipartisan reforms emphasizing constitutional balance rather than restricting presidential emergency authority entirely. The Brennan Center’s comprehensive blueprint goes furthest in recommending explicit prohibitions against using the Act to suspend habeas corpus or impose martial law, provisions that would codify protections currently assumed but not explicitly stated in statutory law. None of these reform proposals have been enacted as of January 2026, leaving the Act’s vague 19th-century language unchanged despite repeated threats of invocation and growing bipartisan recognition of the need for modernization.

Current Status of the Insurrection Act in the US January 2026

Data Source: White House statements, CNN, CBS News, NPR, Minnesota Governor’s Office

As of January 16, 2026, the Insurrection Act remains in its unusual state of being repeatedly threatened but never invoked by President Trump, creating constitutional tension and political uncertainty about when and how this extraordinary power might be deployed. President Trump’s January 16, 2026 threat via social media followed the shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant by ICE agents in Minneapolis, coming one week after the fatal shooting of Renee Macklin Good by an ICE officer that sparked widespread protests against federal immigration enforcement. Trump’s statement that he would “institute the INSURRECTION ACT, which many Presidents have done before me” to stop “professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E.” represents his most direct threat to invoke the Act in his second term, though similar warnings in June 2025 regarding Los Angeles protests and October 2025 regarding Portland and Chicago did not result in actual deployment.

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has characterized ICE operations as a “campaign of organized brutality against the people of Minnesota by our own federal government” and encouraged residents to “protest loudly, urgently, but also peacefully,” while Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has vowed to file a lawsuit challenging any invocation of the Act. Federal courts are currently reviewing Trump’s deployment of National Guard forces under Title 10 authority in various cities, with a Supreme Court decision in December 2025 suggesting that at least six justices are uncomfortable with the administration’s expansive interpretation of domestic military deployment authority. The 33-year gap since the Act’s last use continues to grow, with legal experts noting that Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden all declined to invoke the Act despite various domestic crises including Hurricane Katrina, multiple mass protests, and other civil disturbances that previous administrations might have considered addressing through military force, establishing a modern precedent of restraint that the Trump administration’s repeated threats could fundamentally alter.

Disclaimer: This research report is compiled from publicly available sources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given as to the completeness or reliability of the information. We accept no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages of any kind arising from the use of this report.

Email ID:

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Email

Email *

SUBSCRIBE