Homeowner Insurance Fraud in America 2026
Homeowner insurance fraud is one of the most persistent and costly financial crimes affecting American families today. In its simplest terms, it occurs when a policyholder, contractor, or agent intentionally misrepresents, exaggerates, or fabricates information related to a homeowners insurance claim or policy application in order to receive financial benefits they are not entitled to. This can range from soft fraud — such as inflating the dollar value of items stolen during a burglary — to hard fraud, which involves premeditated acts like deliberately setting fire to a property or staging damage to collect an insurance payout. As of 2026, the problem has grown more sophisticated, with bad actors increasingly leveraging digital tools, AI-generated documents, and synthetic identities to evade detection by even the most advanced insurance company SIU (Special Investigation Unit) teams.
What many Americans don’t fully grasp is just how deeply homeowner insurance fraud bleeds into the everyday costs they pay. The FBI estimates that the average American family pays an additional $400 to $700 per year in inflated insurance premiums directly because of insurance fraud, with some more recent industry analyses placing that figure closer to $900 to $950 annually per household. Across the broader spectrum, the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud (CAIF) — a Washington D.C.-based national anti-fraud organization — has placed the total annual cost of all forms of insurance fraud in the US at a jaw-dropping $308.6 billion per year, a figure that factors in property, casualty, health, life, and workers’ compensation fraud combined. For homeowners specifically, the damage is compounded by the rising frequency of post-disaster contractor fraud, arson-for-profit schemes, assignment of benefits (AOB) abuse, and now, AI-assisted false claims. As we move deeper into 2026, the landscape is only growing more complex — and for the average American homeowner, understanding these risks has never been more important.
Interesting Facts About Homeowner Insurance Fraud in the US 2026
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Total annual insurance fraud cost in the US | $308.6 billion per year across all lines |
| Property & Casualty (P&C) fraud annual cost | $45 billion per year (some estimates: $90–$122 billion) |
| Average extra premium per US household due to fraud | $400–$700/year (FBI estimate); up to $950/year (CAIF) |
| Percentage of P&C insurance claims that are fraudulent | Approximately 10% of all P&C losses |
| Fraudulent claims out of all US insurance claims processed | Approximately 20% of all claims are estimated to be fraudulent |
| Florida’s share of US insurance lawsuits (2021) | Filed 7% of all US homeowner claims but generated 76% of all insurance lawsuits nationwide |
| Contractor fraud losses in 2022 | Estimated $10 billion lost to contractor fraud in a single year (NICB) |
| Fraudulent claims from Hurricane Katrina (2005) | $6 billion out of $80 billion in federal reconstruction funds |
| US natural catastrophe losses in 2023 | Over $93 billion in catastrophe losses; approximately $9.3 billion estimated lost to fraud |
| Identity theft rise in insurance fraud (2025) | 49% projected rise in identity-theft-linked insurance crime by end of 2025 (NICB) |
| Synthetic identity fraud share of NICB referrals | Nearly 25% of identity-theft-related insurance claims involved synthetic identities |
| Identity theft insurance fraud losses in 2024 | More than $47 billion in total losses (AARP) |
| Insurers reporting increase in fraud over 3 years | 60% of insurers reported a rise in fraud between 2022–2025 |
| AI-altered fake documents in claims (2025) | 25–30% of claims today reportedly involve GenAI-altered images, reports, or certificates |
| States with specific insurance fraud laws | 48 states have insurance fraud as a specific criminal offense |
| US consumers concerned about insurance fraud | 78% of Americans say they are concerned about insurance fraud |
Source: Coalition Against Insurance Fraud (CAIF); FBI; National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB); AARP; Colorado State University Global White Collar Crime Research Task Force
The numbers above are startling but paint a clear and undeniable picture. Homeowner insurance fraud is not a niche problem reserved for organized crime rings — it is a daily reality woven into the fabric of the American insurance market. The fact that 20% of all claims filed may carry some element of fraud means that for every five claims an insurer processes, one is potentially misrepresented in some form. And the cost burden doesn’t stop at the insurer’s doorstep. As the FBI has consistently documented, the financial pain of fraud gets passed directly to ordinary policyholders through higher annual premiums — an invisible tax that most homeowners don’t even realize they’re paying.
What is perhaps most alarming heading into 2026 is the pace at which fraud is evolving. The NICB’s September 2025 report revealing a 49% projected rise in identity-theft-driven insurance crime is a watershed moment. Fraudsters are no longer just “shady contractors” knocking on doors after a storm — they are tech-savvy criminals using synthetic identities, deepfakes, and AI-generated documentation to fabricate claims at scale. The 25–30% share of AI-altered claims flagged in 2025 industry assessments shows that the arms race between insurers and fraudsters has entered a genuinely new phase, one where traditional investigative methods simply cannot keep pace without significant technological reinvestment.
Homeowner Insurance Fraud Financial Impact Statistics in the US 2026
| Category | Estimated Annual Loss | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Total US insurance fraud (all lines) | $308.6 billion/year | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud / CSU Global WCCRTF |
| Property & Casualty fraud | $45 billion/year (core estimate) | FBI / Coalition Against Insurance Fraud |
| P&C fraud (broader estimate range) | $90–$122 billion/year | CAIF / Shift Technology (2025) |
| Average extra premium per household | $400–$700/year | FBI |
| Average extra premium per household (updated) | ~$950/year | CAIF 2025 estimate |
| Industry-wide fraud losses growth rate | 10–15% annually | Shift Technology, 2025 |
| P&C insurer loss reserve increase (2024) | ~6–7% increase per $1 billion GWP | Shift Technology, 2025 |
| AI fraud detection savings potential by 2032 | Over $100 billion (Deloitte) / $160 billion (Risk & Insurance) | Deloitte; Risk & Insurance |
Source: Coalition Against Insurance Fraud (CAIF); FBI; Shift Technology 2025 Industry Report; Deloitte 2025
The sheer dollar volume associated with homeowner and property-casualty insurance fraud is difficult to fully comprehend, but the underlying mechanics are straightforward. When fraudulent claims go undetected and are paid out, insurers must increase their loss reserves and raise premiums broadly across their entire customer base to stay financially solvent. In 2024, P&C insurers raised their loss reserves by an estimated 6–7% per $1 billion of gross written premium — a direct response to escalating fraud. This is not an abstract line item; it translates directly to higher renewal premiums for every homeowner in America, including those who have never filed a fraudulent claim in their lives.
What’s particularly important to recognize is that the $308.6 billion annual figure is not simply a static number — it is growing. Industry-wide fraud losses are climbing at an estimated 10–15% per year, which means the total financial drag on the American insurance ecosystem is increasing by somewhere between $30 and $45 billion annually on its own. The Deloitte 2025 prediction that AI-powered fraud detection could ultimately save the P&C sector over $100 billion by 2032 suggests that the industry sees technology as its most viable long-term weapon — but the near-term outlook remains concerning, especially for homeowners in high-risk states who are already absorbing disproportionate premium increases.
Post-Disaster Homeowner Insurance Fraud Statistics in the US 2026
| Event / Category | Fraud Data | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Katrina (2005) — insurance claims filed | ~1.6 million claims, totaling $34.4 billion in insured losses | NICB / FEMA |
| Hurricane Katrina federal reconstruction fraud | $6 billion out of $80 billion in federal funds (~9%) | NICB / Nasdaq |
| US 2023 natural catastrophe total losses | Over $93 billion in total catastrophe losses | NICB |
| Estimated disaster fraud from 2023 catastrophes | ~$9.3 billion (approximately 10% of losses) | NICB / USI.com |
| 2024 global insured catastrophe losses | $140 billion in insured losses from $320 billion in total economic damage | Swiss Re / Insurance Industry (2025 reports) |
| Contractor fraud losses in 2022 | Estimated $10 billion annually (NICB) | NICB |
| Insurers who believe bad actors exploit catastrophes | 62.84% of respondents confirmed disaster fraud as a real occurrence | FRISS 2024 Fraud Report |
| Florida — highest fraudulent insurance scams | Florida recorded the most fraudulent insurance scams in 2024 | SmartFinancial / InsuranceFraud.org |
| Florida lawsuit share vs. national claims share | 76% of US homeowner insurance lawsuits from just 7% of claims filed (2021) | NAIC data / Insurance Journal |
Source: NICB; FEMA; FRISS 2024 Fraud Report; National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC); Insurance Information Institute (III)
Post-disaster fraud is arguably the most emotionally charged form of homeowner insurance fraud because it exploits Americans at their most vulnerable. When a hurricane, tornado, wildfire, or major hailstorm hits, homeowners who have just lost property are suddenly inundated by a wave of unsolicited contractors, “storm chasers,” and unlicensed repair crews offering suspiciously convenient and often below-market services. The NICB has consistently warned that this is the single most fertile environment for fraud, and the data backs it up — when Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005, approximately $6 billion of the $80 billion federal reconstruction budget was estimated to have been consumed by fraudulent activity. Fast-forward to 2023, when US natural catastrophe losses exceeded $93 billion, and applying the industry’s consistent estimate that roughly 10% of disaster losses are fraudulent, that points to approximately $9.3 billion lost to fraud in a single calendar year from storms alone.
Florida continues to stand as the most extreme example of how post-disaster fraud and litigation abuse can destabilize an entire state insurance market. The statistic that Florida homeowners filed just 7% of all US homeowner insurance claims in 2021 yet were responsible for 76% of all homeowner insurance lawsuits nationally is a damning indictment of the systemic assignment of benefits (AOB) abuse and contractor fraud schemes that have plagued the state for years. Even after sweeping legislative reforms in 2022 and 2023, Florida still recorded the highest number of fraudulent insurance scams in 2024, according to SmartFinancial data citing InsuranceFraud.org. The human and financial consequences of this environment are immense — insurers have been exiting Florida in significant numbers, and those who remain continue raising premiums at rates far above the national average.
Contractor Fraud and Homeowner Insurance Fraud Statistics in the US 2026
| Category | Data Point | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated annual contractor fraud losses | $10 billion per year (2022 estimate) | NICB |
| Common contractor fraud tactic | Inflating repair costs, fabricating storm damage, or completing shoddy work | NICB Contractor Fraud Awareness Week |
| Assignment of Benefits (AOB) abuse | Key enabler of contractor fraud — gives contractors legal right to file and collect claims | NICB / Florida DOI |
| States with AOB reform laws passed (as of 2024) | Kentucky, Mississippi, Florida (among others) passed AOB reform | NICB 2024 Annual Report |
| NICB Contractor Fraud Awareness Week (2023) reach | Media outreach reached over 2.6 billion people via ~20,000 news stories | NICB 2023 Annual Report |
| States issuing CFAW proclamations (2023) | 15 states issued official proclamations for Contractor Fraud Awareness Week | NICB 2023 Annual Report |
| North Carolina “bait house” sting operation (2025) | NC DOI and Farm Bureau charged roofing contractor attempting to claim $30,000 for deliberately damaged roof | Insurance Journal, Dec 2025 |
| Homeowners’ insurance national average premium (2025) | $2,300/year for $300,000 in coverage, partly driven by fraud costs | Forbes / Ryan Agency, 2025 |
| Average homeowners insurance premium increase (2022) | 11.2% increase in 2022 from 2021, per NAIC | Insurance Information Institute / NAIC |
Source: NICB; NICB 2023 & 2024 Annual Reports; National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC); Insurance Information Institute (III); Insurance Journal
Contractor fraud targeting homeowners is one of the most brazen and widespread forms of homeowner insurance fraud in the US. Unlike the stereotype of the scheming policyholder torching their own home, contractor fraud is most often committed by third parties — roofing companies, water damage crews, restoration firms, and general contractors — who either manufacture or grossly exaggerate property damage with the homeowner’s cooperation, or sometimes entirely without their knowledge or consent. The NICB estimated that by 2022, contractor fraud was draining as much as $10 billion per year from the property insurance system — a figure that experts believe has continued to grow since then. The Assignment of Benefits mechanism has been widely cited as a key enabler, as it legally transfers the homeowner’s insurance claim rights directly to the contractor, removing the insured from the process entirely and opening a direct, largely unchecked pipeline to insurer funds.
The NICB’s Contractor Fraud Awareness Week (CFAW) — now recognized officially in 15 states — represents a growing national acknowledgment of just how serious this problem has become. The fact that NICB’s 2023 CFAW media campaign reached over 2.6 billion people globally through approximately 20,000 news stories underscores both the scale of the public awareness effort and the severity of the underlying threat. Closer to home, the North Carolina sting operation in 2025 — where a roofing contractor was caught deliberately bending and damaging roof shingles at a “bait house” set up by the NC Department of Insurance and Farm Bureau, then attempting to submit a $30,000 fraudulent claim — illustrates how brazen these schemes have become. From Florida to the Pacific Northwest, the contractor fraud epidemic is a primary driver behind the $2,300 average annual homeowners insurance premium Americans now face.
Arson and Hard Fraud Homeowner Insurance Statistics in the US 2026
| Category | Data Point | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Intentional structure fires in the US (2020) | 39,851 total arson offenses, of which 15,079 were structure fires | FBI / Statista |
| Arson increase in first half of 2020 vs. 2019 | 19.2% national increase in arson | FBI 2020 Preliminary UCR |
| Arson increase in cities with population over 1 million | 52.1% rise in arson in major cities (first half of 2020) | FBI 2020 Preliminary UCR |
| Intentional structure fires — 2017 data | 22,500 intentional structure fires; $582 million in property loss; 280 civilian deaths | NFPA / NICB |
| Hard fraud classification | Deliberate property destruction (e.g., arson) is typically a felony, punishable by prison | NAIC; FBI |
| Soft fraud prevalence in homeowner claims | Exaggerating storm damage, inflating item values — far more common than hard fraud | NAIC definition |
| Percentage of intentional fires causing deaths | 8% of intentionally set fires resulted in 14% of total civilian deaths | NFPA data |
| Between 10%–20% of all insurance claims | Industry-wide estimate of fraudulent claims | Insurance Information Institute (III) |
| Insurers investing in AI for fraud detection (2025) | 76% of insurance companies have implemented generative AI tools | Talli.ai / Industry 2025 data |
Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reports; National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); NICB; National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC); Insurance Information Institute (III)
Hard fraud — particularly arson-for-profit — remains one of the most dangerous and destructive forms of homeowner insurance fraud in the United States. Unlike a policyholder who merely overstates the value of stolen electronics, an arsonist commits a crime that can and does kill people. The 2020 FBI data showing a 19.2% national increase in arson — with a staggering 52.1% rise in cities with populations exceeding 1 million residents — signals an alarming trend that correlates with economic stress during the pandemic years. Looking at the 2017 NFPA data, the 22,500 intentional structure fires that year caused $582 million in property loss and were directly responsible for 280 civilian deaths — a grim reminder that this is far from a victimless crime. The statistic that just 8% of intentionally set fires account for 14% of all civilian fire deaths underscores just how lethally disproportionate the impact of arson can be.
On the softer end of hard fraud, deliberate property staging and manufactured damage schemes — such as the North Carolina roofing contractor case — are classified as felonies across most of the 48 states that have specific insurance fraud statutes. The industry’s broad estimate that between 10% and 20% of all insurance claims carry some element of fraud covers both the premeditated destruction end of the spectrum and the far more common soft fraud behaviors like exaggerating storm damage scope or misrepresenting the age and value of covered items. The rapid adoption of AI-powered fraud detection — now used by 76% of US insurers — reflects the industry’s recognition that human investigators alone simply cannot process the volume of claims needed to flag the full breadth of fraudulent activity across the homeowner insurance market.
Identity Theft and Digital Homeowner Insurance Fraud Statistics in the US 2026
| Category | Data Point | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Projected rise in identity theft-linked insurance fraud (2025) | 49% projected rise by end of 2025 | NICB, September 2025 |
| Analysis period for NICB identity fraud report | Claims analyzed from 2022 through June 30, 2025 | NICB |
| Share of NICB referrals involving synthetic identities | Nearly 25% (approximately 1 in 4) | NICB, September 2025 |
| Total identity theft insurance fraud losses in 2024 | More than $47 billion | AARP, cited by NICB |
| GenAI-altered fake documents in claims (2025) | 25–30% of claims involve AI-altered images, reports, or certificates | Shift Technology, 2025 |
| NICB machine-learning pilot | Piloting ML tool to detect anomalous identity patterns (e.g., multiple DOBs per SSN) | NICB, 2025 |
| Insurance companies using GenAI (2025) | 76% of insurers have implemented generative AI | Industry 2025 data |
| AI fraud detection improvement over traditional methods | 28% better detection rates vs. traditional methods | Industry 2025 benchmarks |
| FTC: Millennials losing money to fraud via email scams | 77% more likely to lose money to email-based scams than older age groups | FTC, October 2019 |
| Consumers 20s–30s more likely to report fraud losses | 25% more likely to report losing money to fraud than those 40 and over | FTC, October 2019 |
Source: National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB); AARP; Shift Technology 2025 Report; Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
The digital transformation of homeowner insurance fraud is perhaps the most consequential story in the 2026 insurance fraud landscape. What was once primarily a physical crime — burning a structure, staging a burglary, hiding pre-existing damage — has now gained an entirely new digital dimension. The NICB’s landmark September 2025 report projecting a 49% rise in identity-theft-linked insurance crime by year-end is the clearest signal yet that fraud has fundamentally changed. The emergence of synthetic identities — fabricated persons assembled from a mix of real and fictional personally identifiable information — now accounts for nearly 1 in 4 identity-fraud-related insurance referrals to the NICB. These are not identities that can be traced back to a known fraud victim; they are ghost people, constructed specifically to exploit the insurance system.
Perhaps even more unsettling is the finding from Shift Technology’s 2025 industry report that 25–30% of claims currently involve GenAI-altered fake documents — falsified photos of property damage, synthetic medical reports, or manipulated contractor estimates. The speed at which AI tools can now produce convincing fraudulent documentation has compressed the time it takes to mount a fraud scheme from weeks or months to hours. In response, 76% of US insurers have deployed generative AI tools of their own, with AI-powered detection systems now demonstrating 28% better fraud detection rates than traditional claims review methods. This is a genuine technological arms race, and the stakes — measured in the billions of dollars that flow through the homeowner insurance fraud pipeline every year — could not be higher for American policyholders.
State-Level and Legislative Homeowner Insurance Fraud Statistics in the US 2026
| State / Legislative Category | Data Point | Source |
|---|---|---|
| States with specific insurance fraud criminal laws | 48 states | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, updated 2025 |
| States with an insurance fraud bureau | 42 states plus the District of Columbia | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud |
| States requiring insurers to report suspected fraud | 43 states plus the District of Columbia | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud |
| Florida — share of national homeowner insurance lawsuits | 76% of all US homeowner insurance lawsuits (from 7% of claims, 2021 data) | NAIC / Insurance Journal |
| Florida — 2024 fraud ranking | Most fraudulent insurance scams recorded in 2024 | SmartFinancial, 2026 |
| NY Governor Hochul — 2026 anti-fraud measures | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud joined Governor Hochul to announce 2026 anti-fraud legislative package | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, Jan 26, 2026 |
| Federal False Claims Act whistleblower recoveries | DOJ obtained more than $2.2 billion in FY2020 settlements from fraud | DOJ, 2020 |
| NICB data privacy law exemptions secured | 16 state data privacy laws now include NICB-specific exemptions | NICB 2024 Annual Report |
| Oregon — insurance fraud law status | Only state with no insurance fraud law of any kind | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud |
| Michigan FIU fraud reports received (Jul 2024–Jun 2025) | 4,756 fraud reports received in one year | Michigan DIFS FIU Annual Report 2025 |
Source: Coalition Against Insurance Fraud; NAIC; DOJ; NICB 2024 Annual Report; Michigan DIFS FIU Annual Report 2025; SmartFinancial
The legislative and regulatory landscape surrounding homeowner insurance fraud is as patchwork and uneven as the fraud itself. The fact that 48 states have codified insurance fraud as a specific criminal offense is encouraging, but the absence of a federal standard means enforcement quality, prosecution rates, and consumer protections vary enormously from state to state. Only 42 states and DC even maintain a dedicated insurance fraud bureau, and just 43 states and DC legally require insurers to report suspected fraud to a state agency. The gap between these numbers isn’t academic — it means that in some states, suspected fraud can legally go unreported, and there is no dedicated government body tasked with investigating it. Oregon remains the lone state with no insurance fraud law of any kind, an outlier that experts and consumer advocates have long criticized.
The January 2026 announcement by New York Governor Hochul, joined by the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, to push forward a 2026 state anti-fraud legislative package is a sign that momentum is building at the executive level. Meanwhile, at the ground level, the Michigan DIFS Fraud Investigation Unit received 4,756 fraud reports in just the 12-month period from July 2024 to June 2025 — a number that illustrates the sheer volume of suspected fraud cases being flagged across a single mid-sized state. And the NICB’s success in securing 16 state-level data privacy exemptions that allow it to share and access claims data for anti-fraud purposes is a quiet but meaningful regulatory win, removing barriers that had previously hampered cross-carrier fraud detection efforts.
Consumer Awareness and Homeowner Insurance Fraud Impact Statistics in the US 2026
| Category | Data Point | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Americans concerned about insurance fraud | 78% say they are concerned | Coalition Against Insurance Fraud survey |
| Consumers who believe they have been fraud victims | Nearly 1 in 3 (32%) believe they’ve been a victim of insurance fraud | ValuePenguin / LendingTree, 2021 |
| Policyholders who admitted lying to insurers | 22% of consumers admit to lying to their auto/home insurer | ValuePenguin / LendingTree, 2021 |
| Policyholders committing application fraud to lower rates | $35.1 billion in annual rate-lowering fraud through misrepresentation | CSU Global WCCRTF |
| Policyholders who never reported suspected fraud | 29% of suspected fraud victims never reported it | ValuePenguin, 2021 |
| Older Americans’ average fraud loss | Average loss of $34,200 per elder fraud victim | Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) |
| Estimated annual elder fraud losses | $2.9 billion – $36.5 billion per year | CFPB, 2019 |
| Insured US homes that had a claim in 2023 | 5.3% of insured homes filed a claim in 2023 | ISO / Insurance Information Institute |
| Homeowners who prepared a possessions inventory | Only 47% of homeowners prepared one (2023 survey) | Triple-I / Munich Re Consumer Survey, 2023 |
| Homeowners paying 30%+ of income on housing costs (2024) | 29.3% of homeowners spend 30% or more of income on housing | US Census Bureau American Community Survey, 2024 |
Source: Coalition Against Insurance Fraud; ValuePenguin / LendingTree; Colorado State University Global WCCRTF; Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB); Insurance Information Institute (III) / ISO; US Census Bureau
The consumer dimension of homeowner insurance fraud reveals a troubling paradox: 78% of Americans say they are worried about insurance fraud, yet 22% of policyholders have admitted to lying to their insurer — whether by exaggerating damage, misrepresenting property conditions, or providing false information on applications to secure lower premiums. This gap between stated concern and actual behavior is not simply hypocrisy; it reflects a widespread normalization of soft fraud that has been building for years. The $35.1 billion lost annually from policyholders deliberately misrepresenting information on their insurance applications — not through organized crime but through individual consumer choices — is a number that dwarfs many other fraud categories and is largely invisible in public discourse.
The elder fraud data is particularly sobering. Older Americans victimized by insurance fraud — including homeowners targeted by predatory contractors or fake insurance agents — face average losses of $34,200 per victim, a devastating financial blow for retirees on fixed incomes. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has estimated aggregate elder fraud losses at anywhere from $2.9 billion to $36.5 billion per year, a range that reflects how dramatically underreported this crime category remains. The fact that 29% of all suspected fraud victims never report their suspicions compounds the problem — without reporting, cases go uninvestigated, perpetrators are never held accountable, and patterns that could inform law enforcement go undetected. Increasing consumer literacy around what constitutes homeowner insurance fraud, how to report it, and what the personal consequences of even small-scale misrepresentation can be, remains one of the most critical yet underfunded fronts in the broader fight against insurance fraud in the US in 2026.
Disclaimer: This research report is compiled from publicly available sources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given as to the completeness or reliability of the information. We accept no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages of any kind arising from the use of this report.

