Bunker Busters Statistics in US 2026 | Key Facts

Bunker Busters in US

Bunker Busters in America 2026

The United States military’s use of bunker buster bombs reached a historic turning point in 2025, setting the stage for an aggressive program overhaul entering 2026. For decades, these colossal penetrating munitions sat quietly in secure storage at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, purpose-built for one specific type of mission — reaching and destroying Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBTs) that no other conventional weapon in the world could touch. The landmark moment came on June 22, 2025, when seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers dropped 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster bombs on Iran’s nuclear facilities in what became known as Operation Midnight Hammer — the first-ever combat use of this weapon system. That single operation consumed a significant portion of the entire GBU-57 inventory, triggering urgent procurement actions that now define the American bunker buster landscape heading into 2026. Then, less than nine months later, history repeated itself — only at a far larger scale. On February 28, 2026, the United States launched Operation Epic Fury, the most expansive conventional military campaign in a generation, once again deploying B-2 Spirit stealth bombers carrying GBU-57 MOP bunker buster bombs against Iran’s underground nuclear facilities — this time as part of a sweeping, simultaneous assault involving over 500 sorties, four carrier strike groups, 14 guided-missile destroyers, and the first-ever combat use of U.S. one-way attack drones. The GBU-57 MOP bunker buster had now been used in anger twice within eight months, cementing its status as the most operationally consequential conventional weapon in the modern American arsenal.

As the United States moves through 2026, the bunker buster program is simultaneously engaged on three fronts: restocking the depleted GBU-57 MOP inventory through a new Boeing sole-source contract valued at over $100 million, sustaining existing operational capability through upgraded variants and reverse-engineered components, and fast-tracking the Next Generation Penetrator (NGP) — the next-generation bunker buster bomb designed to fly on the B-21 Raider stealth bomber. The twin combat deployments of the GBU-57 — against Fordow and Natanz in June 2025 and against Iran’s rebuilt and deliberately deeper underground facilities in February 2026 — have fundamentally reshaped how the Pentagon thinks about bunker buster production rates, inventory thresholds, and the urgency of next-generation capability development. Iran’s determined effort to rebuild its underground nuclear infrastructure even deeper after Midnight Hammer, specifically to defeat the same bunker buster technology that destroyed it, has accelerated every timeline in the US bunker buster program and poured fresh urgency into the NGP’s development schedule. With tensions involving China and North Korea also driving demand for the same class of penetrating munitions, the strategic importance of bunker busters in the US has never been higher. The 2026 US bunker buster statistics tell a story of an arsenal battle-tested twice in the span of a year — under rapid reconstruction, record investment, and more operational scrutiny than at any prior point in the program’s history.

Interesting Facts About Bunker Busters in the US 2026

Fact Detail
First combat use of GBU-57 MOP June 22, 2025 — Operation Midnight Hammer
Number of MOPs dropped in combat 14 GBU-57 bombs dropped on Iran’s nuclear sites
Bombers deployed in Operation Midnight Hammer 7 B-2 Spirit stealth bombers from Whiteman AFB, Missouri
MOPs dropped on Fordow facility 12 MOPs dropped sequentially on two ventilation shafts
MOPs dropped on Natanz facility 2 MOPs
Weight of one GBU-57 MOP 30,000 pounds (13,600 kg) — world’s heaviest conventional bomb
Length of the GBU-57 MOP 20.5 feet (6.2 meters)
Diameter of the GBU-57 MOP 31.5 inches (0.8 meters)
Explosive payload Over 5,300 pounds of explosives (AFX-757 + PBXN-114)
Penetration depth (earth) Up to 200 feet (60 meters) of earth
Penetration depth (reinforced concrete) Up to 60 feet (18 meters) of reinforced concrete
Number of B-2s capable of carrying MOP 20 B-2 Spirit bombers in USAF fleet
MOPs per B-2 sortie (B-2) 2 MOPs per aircraft per mission
MOPs per B-21 sortie (future) 1 MOP (due to smaller payload bay)
Minimum confirmed GBU-57 units delivered by 2015 At least 20 units (exact inventory classified)
MOP entered operational service 2011
MOP first static detonation test 2007 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico
GBU-57 variants to date 7 variants (GBU-57A/B through GBU-57F/B)
Explosive power vs predecessor (BLU-109) Over 10 times more explosive power
Years DTRA studied Fordow before the strike ~15 years
MOP production tripling announcement Announced in 2024

Source: U.S. Air Force, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) — publicly released acquisition documents and fact sheets

The facts table above reveals just how extraordinary the GBU-57 MOP bunker buster truly is as a weapons system. Its weight of 30,000 pounds makes it the heaviest conventional bomb ever produced by the United States, and the gap between the MOP and any prior bunker buster bomb is immense — it carries over 10 times the explosive power of the BLU-109, its closest predecessor. What is equally striking is that the U.S. Air Force had spent roughly 15 years studying the Fordow site specifically before the June 2025 strike, underscoring that the GBU-57 MOP was designed with a specific mission profile in mind, not as a general-purpose weapon.

The numbers surrounding Operation Midnight Hammer further illustrate how rare and high-stakes bunker buster employment truly is. Deploying 7 B-2 stealth bombers simultaneously and expending 14 of what may be fewer than 50 total GBU-57 units represents an enormous operational commitment. The decision to drop 12 MOPs on Fordow alone — sequentially into ventilation shafts — demonstrates the level of intelligence preparation and target engineering that preceded the mission. For 2026 US bunker buster statistics, these facts establish the baseline from which all subsequent procurement and development statistics flow.

Operation Epic Fury — Bunker Buster Use in the Iran War 2026

Metric Data
Operation name (U.S.) Operation Epic Fury
Partner operation name (Israel) Operation Roaring Lion
Iranian retaliation operation Operation True Promise 4
Date commenced February 28, 2026
Exact start time 1:15 a.m. Eastern Time (ET)
Ordering authority President Donald Trump — directed via U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM)
CENTCOM’s description “The largest regional concentration of American military firepower in a generation”
GBU-57 MOP bunker busters confirmed used Yes — GBU-57 MOP deployed against Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP)
Primary delivery aircraft B-2 Spirit stealth bombers
Nuclear targets struck Fordow (Qom), residual nuclear infrastructure at Isfahan, Parchin military complex
Non-nuclear targets struck IRGC command and control, air defense systems, missile and drone launch sites, military airfields, Iran Atomic Energy Agency HQ (Tehran), naval assets at Konarak Naval Base
Leadership target struck Khamenei compound, Tehran — Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei killed
Israeli bunker busters used on Khamenei compound Up to 30 bunker buster bombs (reported by Israeli sources)
First use of one-way attack drones in U.S. combat Yes — Task Force Scorpion Strike employed them for the first time
Strike sorties in first wave Over 500 sorties (air, land, sea)
U.S. carrier strike groups in theater 4 CSGs: USS Gerald R. Ford, USS Abraham Lincoln, USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, USS Harry S. Truman
Guided-missile destroyers in region 14 destroyers (carrying SM-3, SM-2, SM-6 missiles)
Munition types used GBU-57 MOP, Tomahawk cruise missiles (from Arabian Sea destroyers), air-launched precision munitions, one-way attack drones
Iranian missiles/drones repelled Hundreds — U.S. and partner forces successfully defended against wave of retaliatory strikes
U.S. casualties Zero (CENTCOM confirmed 1:20 p.m. ET, February 28, 2026)
Damage to U.S. installations “Minimal” — no operational impact (per CENTCOM)
Difference from Operation Midnight Hammer Midnight Hammer = limited nuclear strikes; Epic Fury = broad campaign targeting leadership, missiles, proxies, navy
Context Midnight Hammer (June 2025) set Iran’s nuclear program back ~2 years; Iran began rebuilding deeper underground; satellite imagery Feb 2026 showed rapid reconstitution
Pentagon rationale for second strike Iran retained enrichment knowledge, refused concessions in Oman & Geneva talks, resumed construction of deeper underground facilities

Source: U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) press release, February 28, 2026; The White House official statement; Aviation Week Network; USNI News; Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS); Defense News; Middle East Forum; NPR

Operation Epic Fury represents the most consequential conventional bunker buster employment in American military history — a full-scale, multiday combat operation launched on February 28, 2026, involving B-2 Spirit stealth bombers dropping GBU-57 MOP bunker buster bombs on Iran’s underground nuclear infrastructure for the second time in eight months. Unlike Operation Midnight Hammer in June 2025, which was a narrow, targeted strike on three nuclear sites, Epic Fury was built around a far broader campaign framework: four concurrent military objectives as declared by President Trump — destroying Iran’s nuclear program remnants, razing its missile production industry, degrading proxy networks, and annihilating its navy — alongside the explicit political objective of regime change. CENTCOM officially confirmed the operation commenced at 1:15 a.m. Eastern Time, with munitions launched simultaneously from air, land, and sea, and characterized the combined force as “the largest regional concentration of American military firepower in a generation.” The first confirmed use of U.S. one-way attack drones in combat — by Task Force Scorpion Strike — occurred during this operation, marking yet another historical first alongside the second combat employment of the GBU-57 MOP.

The decision to launch Operation Epic Fury was driven directly by intelligence gathered in the eight months following Midnight Hammer. A July 2025 Pentagon damage assessment had concluded the June strikes set Iran’s nuclear reconstitution timeline back approximately two years to mid-2027 — but satellite imagery by February 2026 told a more urgent story. Iranian engineers were already sealing damaged underground facility entrances at Isfahan with reinforced concrete, burying tunnel entrances deeper, and reconstructing missile infrastructure at an accelerated pace. Critically, Iran was deliberately engineering the rebuild to be deeper underground specifically to defeat the same class of bunker buster bombs that destroyed the facilities in June 2025. After three rounds of failed indirect nuclear talks in Oman and Geneva, and Iran’s rejection of every American demand for verifiable denuclearization, the Trump administration concluded force was the only remaining option. CENTCOM reported zero U.S. casualties and “minimal damage” to U.S. installations despite Iran retaliating with hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones targeting U.S. military bases across Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, and Bahrain — all successfully intercepted by the 14 guided-missile destroyers and THAAD/Patriot ground-based systems positioned throughout the theater.

GBU-57 MOP Technical Specifications 2026

Specification Data
Designation GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)
Developer Boeing / Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
Total weight 30,000 lb (13,600 kg)
Warhead designation BLU-127/B series
Explosive payload weight 5,342 lb (2,423 kg)
Explosive compounds AFX-757 — 4,590 lb (2,082 kg) + PBXN-114 — 752 lb (341 kg)
Casing material High-density Eglin Steel (ES-1) alloy
Length 20.5 ft (6.2 m)
Diameter 31.5 in (0.8 m)
Guidance system GPS-assisted Inertial Navigation System (INS) via KMU-612/B tail kit
Fuze system Large Penetrator Smart Fuze (LPSF) with void-sensing capability
Fin type Grid fins (foldable for B-2 bomb bay storage)
Penetration — earth Up to 200 ft (60 m)
Penetration — 5,000 psi concrete Up to 60 ft (18 m)
Circular Error Probable (CEP) Within meters of designated target
Delivery aircraft (current) Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit only
Delivery aircraft (future) Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider
Bombs per B-2 sortie 2
Program entered service 2011

Source: U.S. Air Force fact sheet; Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Munitions Directorate; Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)

The GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator is without question the most formidable conventional bunker buster bomb ever fielded by any nation. Its Eglin Steel alloy casing is specifically engineered to survive the brutal forces of high-speed penetration through concrete and rock before the Large Penetrator Smart Fuze (LPSF) triggers detonation inside the target. The combination of GPS and Inertial Navigation System (INS) guidance allows the bomb to self-correct mid-flight, even in environments with degraded satellite signals, landing within meters of the designated aim point despite being dropped from extreme altitude. These specifications represent the absolute pinnacle of conventional bunker busting technology as of 2026.

What makes the technical profile of the GBU-57 MOP particularly significant is the interplay between its penetration depth and the target set it was designed to defeat. Iran’s Fordow Uranium Enrichment Plant is estimated to sit 80–90 meters (260–300 feet) underground, which presents a genuine challenge even for the MOP. The sequential employment of 12 bombs on Fordow’s ventilation shafts during Operation Midnight Hammer — the first bomb removing a defensive concrete cap and subsequent bombs following each other down the shaft — was a tactically creative solution to the depth problem. The void-sensing fuze technology was essential to this approach, triggering detonation at precisely the right moment as the bomb sensed the internal cavity of the underground complex.

Operation Midnight Hammer — Combat Use Statistics 2025–2026

Metric Data
Operation name Operation Midnight Hammer
Date of strikes June 22, 2025 (approx. 2:30 a.m. local time)
Number of B-2 bombers deployed 7 B-2 Spirit stealth bombers
Base of departure Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri
Total GBU-57 MOPs dropped 14 bombs
MOPs on Fordow (Uranium Enrichment Plant) 12 MOPs (sequential into 2 ventilation shafts)
MOPs on Natanz Nuclear Facility 2 MOPs
Fordow facility depth underground Estimated 80–90 meters (260–300 ft)
Tomahawk cruise missiles also fired 30 Tomahawks from a U.S. submarine
Sites targeted Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center
First-ever combat use of GBU-57 Yes — 15+ years after program initiation
Impact speed of MOP into shafts Greater than 1,000 feet per second
Post-strike DTRA assessment started Immediately after June 22, 2025
Pentagon initial damage assessment July 2025 — Fordow severely damaged
Historical significance First U.S. attack on Iranian territory since 1988

Source: U.S. Department of Defense press briefings; Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine’s official public statements; Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC)

Operation Midnight Hammer stands as the defining bunker buster event of the modern era and the pivotal milestone in US bunker buster statistics for 2025–2026. The deployment of 7 B-2 Spirit stealth bombers simultaneously — each carrying 2 GBU-57 MOP bunker busters — represented a massive commitment of America’s most prized strategic assets in a single conventional strike mission. The sequential drop of 12 bombs into Fordow’s ventilation shafts, with each bomb drilling deeper and detonating in the “mission space” underground, was described by Gen. Dan Caine as the culmination of 15 years of meticulous intelligence work by DTRA analysts who had monitored every vent shaft, exhaust shaft, and piece of equipment entering the facility since 2009.

The strategic consequences of Operation Midnight Hammer continue to define 2026 bunker buster policy in the US. Expending 14 GBU-57 units in a single operation — out of a total inventory that was never publicly disclosed but is believed to have been relatively small — immediately triggered the sole-source procurement action with Boeing to replenish the stockpile. The parallel firing of 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles from a U.S. submarine reinforces the layered nature of modern U.S. bunker buster strikes, combining the unique penetrating power of the MOP with stand-off cruise missile fire against less fortified targets at Natanz and Isfahan. This combined-arms approach is likely to shape US bunker buster doctrine for years to come.

GBU-57 MOP Procurement & Replenishment Statistics 2026

Metric Data
Post-strike contract awardee Boeing (sole-source, only qualified manufacturer)
Contract value Over $100 million
Contract type Sole-source (no competitive tender)
Justification for sole-source Boeing has 18+ years of exclusive MOP design expertise
Contract posted publicly February 12, 2026 (partially redacted)
Contracting authority Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC)
Purpose of contract Restore operational readiness post-Operation Midnight Hammer
Projected delivery start date January 2028
Prior confirmed deliveries (as of 2015) At least 20 units
Production capacity announcement (2024) Production tripled (at minimum)
FY2018 contract for additional units $20.9 million (undisclosed quantity)
October 2019 steel forging contract $90 million — for BLU-127C/B warhead cases
2025 reverse-engineered subcomponent August 2025 — critical part reverse-engineered, saving 4 years of design work
Technology used in reverse engineering ATACMS ballistic missile components leveraged
Vendor lock concern raised Pentagon pushing to diversify MOP supply chain in 2026

Source: U.S. Air Force publicly released Justification & Approval (J&A) document, February 2026; Air Force Global Strike Command; Defense News reporting on SAM.gov filings

The 2026 GBU-57 MOP procurement statistics reveal a system under pressure from two competing forces: the urgent need to replenish a depleted inventory and the longer-term effort to reduce dependency on a single contractor. Boeing’s 18-year exclusive relationship with the MOP program has created what the Pentagon now publicly acknowledges as a vendor lock problem — when 14 bombs were expended in a single night, only one company in the country could manufacture replacements, and that company’s production timeline means new units won’t be delivered until January 2028. The sole-source contract valued at over $100 million was the only realistic path to restoring readiness within the Air Force Global Strike Command’s required timelines.

The August 2025 success in reverse-engineering a critical MOP subcomponent — leveraging existing Army ATACMS ballistic missile technology to save an estimated 4 years of design work — signals that the U.S. government is actively working to reduce this vulnerability going forward. The $90 million October 2019 contract for BLU-127C/B warhead case forgings and the 2024 announcement that production capacity would be at minimum tripled now make more sense in retrospect — the Air Force had been quietly building toward greater surge capacity long before Operation Midnight Hammer made the urgency undeniable. As of early 2026, the replenishment timeline and vendor diversification remain the central challenges for US bunker buster program managers.

Next Generation Penetrator (NGP) Program Statistics 2026

Metric Data
Program name Next Generation Penetrator (NGP)
System Design Agent (prime contractor) Applied Research Associates (ARA), Albuquerque, NM
Industry partner Boeing (tail kit and all-up-round integration)
Contract managing office AFLCMC Eglin Munitions Directorate, Eglin AFB, Florida
Contract duration 24 months
Contract announced September 5, 2025
FY2025 budget request for NGP $120.8 million
FY2026 budget request for NGP $73.7 million
Total FY2025 NGP contract awards planned ~$107 million (various contracts)
Prototype demonstration completion target End of FY2027
Sub-scale prototypes required ~10 subscale test articles
Full-scale prototypes required 3–5 full-scale warheads
Maximum warhead weight (requirement) Under 22,000 pounds (vs. 30,000 lb MOP)
Required accuracy Within 2.2 meters of target, 90% of the time
Guidance capability GPS-aided AND GPS-degraded/denied environments
Technology Readiness Level (TRL) target TRL 5–6 by end of prototype phase
Potential future capability Stand-off delivery via rocket booster
Primary delivery platform B-21 Raider stealth bomber
B-21 payload capacity for NGP 1 NGP per sortie (vs. 2 MOPs on B-2)

Source: U.S. Air Force FY2025 and FY2026 budget documents; Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) contracting notices; ARA official announcement; DefenseScoop and Air & Space Forces Magazine reporting on USAF contract awards

The Next Generation Penetrator (NGP) program is arguably the most consequential new bunker buster development in US history since the original GBU-57 MOP program was launched in 2004. With $120.8 million requested in FY2025 and $73.7 million in FY2026, the Air Force has signaled that the NGP is a top-priority munitions development effort. The selection of Applied Research Associates (ARA) — partnered with Boeing — as the system design agent reflects a deliberate effort to introduce competitive pressure while retaining Boeing’s irreplaceable institutional knowledge of penetrator tail kit design. The requirement to deliver approximately 10 subscale and 3–5 full-scale prototypes within 18–24 months of contract award represents an aggressive development timeline driven by the lessons of Operation Midnight Hammer.

The NGP’s technical requirements represent a meaningful leap over the GBU-57 MOP in several critical dimensions. The demanded accuracy of within 2.2 meters, 90 percent of the time, in both GPS-aided and GPS-denied environments, directly addresses the growing threat of adversary electronic warfare and GPS jamming that could undermine the effectiveness of the current MOP’s guidance system in a high-end conflict. Reducing the warhead weight to under 22,000 pounds — nearly 8,000 pounds lighter than the current MOP — is driven partly by the B-21 Raider’s smaller internal weapons bay, but it also opens up future possibilities for integration on a wider range of aircraft. The possible addition of a rocket booster for stand-off delivery would be a transformational capability, allowing B-21 crews to release the weapon from well outside adversary air defense range.

Bunker Buster Bombs Comparison Statistics 2026: GBU-28 vs. GBU-57 vs. NGP

Specification GBU-28 GBU-57 MOP NGP (Target)
Designation GBU-28 GBU-57/B MOP Next Generation Penetrator
Weight 5,000 lb (2,300 kg) 30,000 lb (13,600 kg) Under 22,000 lb
Length ~14 ft 20.5 ft (6.2 m) TBD
Explosive payload ~675 lb 5,342 lb (2,423 kg) TBD
Penetration — concrete ~6 ft ~60 ft (18 m) ≥ MOP capability
Penetration — earth ~100 ft ~200 ft (60 m) ≥ MOP capability
Guidance GPS/INS GPS/INS + LPSF void-sensing GPS + GPS-denied capable
Required accuracy Standard CEP Within meters 2.2 m (90% of time)
Delivery aircraft F-15E, B-52, B-1B B-2 Spirit only B-21 Raider (primary)
Stand-off capable No No Possible (rocket booster)
Status (2026) In service In service, restocking Prototype phase
Combat use Yes (Iraq, Afghanistan) Yes (Iran, June 2025) Not yet

Source: U.S. Air Force public fact sheets; Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL); DefenseScoop; Air & Space Forces Magazine; AFLCMC contracting documents

The comparison table above illustrates the extraordinary technological leap that has taken place across US bunker buster bomb generations. The GBU-28 — itself once considered a marvel of penetration technology — weighs 5,000 pounds, carries roughly 675 pounds of explosive, and can penetrate approximately 6 feet of reinforced concrete. The GBU-57 MOP, by contrast, weighs 30,000 pounds, carries over 5,300 pounds of explosive, and can penetrate up to 60 feet of reinforced concrete — roughly 10 times the penetration capability in concrete. This gap reflects the dramatic deepening of adversary underground facility construction over the past three decades, driven specifically by the knowledge that American bunker busters were getting better with each generation.

The Next Generation Penetrator (NGP) must thread a difficult needle: it needs to be lighter than the GBU-57 MOP by at least 8,000 pounds to be compatible with the B-21 Raider’s internal weapons bay, while maintaining or exceeding the MOP’s penetration and destructive capabilities against the same class of Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBTs). The addition of GPS-denied guidance technology and the potential for stand-off delivery via rocket booster mean the NGP will be a substantially more capable weapon than its size reduction suggests. As of 2026, the NGP prototype program is underway, with full-scale warhead testing expected before the end of FY2027.

B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber — Bunker Buster Delivery Platform Statistics 2026

Metric Data
Aircraft Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit
Total B-2 fleet size 20 aircraft (all based at Whiteman AFB, Missouri)
Only current MOP-capable aircraft Yes — exclusively cleared to carry GBU-57
GBU-57 MOP units per sortie 2 MOPs (one per internal bomb bay)
B-2 first tested MOP 2014, 2015, 2016 (multiple validated test drops)
B-2 validated 4-bomb test drop 2017 (White Sands Missile Range, NM)
B-2s deployed in Operation Midnight Hammer 7 B-2s
Departure base for Operation Midnight Hammer Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri
B-2 retirement timeline Being phased out; replaced by B-21 Raider
Future MOP-capable aircraft B-21 Raider (1 MOP per sortie only)
B-21 MOP limitation vs B-2 Carries 1 MOP vs. 2 on B-2 (smaller bomb bay)
B-2 stealth attributes Low-observable design; penetrates advanced integrated air defenses
B-52 role Used for early MOP testing only — not combat-configured
AFGSC manages All B-2 operations and MOP employment

Source: U.S. Air Force; Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC); Northrop Grumman; Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) reports

The B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is the singular linchpin of the entire US bunker buster capability in 2026. Without the B-2, the GBU-57 MOP cannot be employed — the bomb is simply too heavy and large for any other current US aircraft to carry internally. The fact that the entire B-2 fleet consists of only 20 aircraft, all based at a single location (Whiteman Air Force Base), underscores the concentrated and strategically precious nature of this capability. Deploying 7 of those 20 aircraft simultaneously in Operation Midnight Hammer — and expending 14 of the nation’s MOP inventory in a single night — demonstrates both the massive strategic weight the US placed on that mission and the significant readiness implications that followed.

Looking ahead, the transition from the B-2 to the B-21 Raider as the primary bunker buster delivery platform introduces a notable constraint: the B-21 will only be able to carry one MOP per sortie due to its smaller internal weapons bay, compared to the B-2’s capacity of two. This halving of per-aircraft bunker buster delivery capacity is a primary driver behind the urgency of the Next Generation Penetrator (NGP) program — a lighter, more capable weapon that better fits the B-21’s geometry while ideally exceeding the MOP’s effectiveness. The NGP is therefore not merely an upgrade; it is a structural necessity for maintaining US bunker buster credibility as the B-21 fleet grows and the aging B-2 fleet is eventually retired.

US Defense Spending on Bunker Buster Programs 2026

Program / Contract Amount Year
Boeing initial MOP development contract $30 million November 2004
Total MOP development cost (estimate) $400–$500 million 2004–2011
B-2 retrofit for MOP carriage (Northrop Grumman) Classified July 2007
USAF MOP procurement contract (FY2018) $20.9 million FY2018
Warhead case steel forging contracts $90 million October 2019
MOP program spending (FY2025) $120.8 million FY2025
NGP contracts awarded (FY2025 planned) ~$107 million FY2025
MOP replenishment contract (Boeing, 2026) Over $100 million February 2026
NGP research & development request (FY2026) $73.7 million FY2026
Prototype demonstration completion target FY2027 FY2027

Source: U.S. Air Force budget documents (FY2025, FY2026); SAM.gov contracting notices; Air Force Global Strike Command publicly released Justification & Approval (J&A) documentation; Air & Space Forces Magazine

The financial trajectory of US bunker buster spending tells a clear story of escalation. From the initial $30 million Boeing development contract in 2004 to a total development cost estimated between $400–$500 million at program maturity, the GBU-57 MOP was never a cheap weapon. But the operational expenditure in a single night — 14 bombs at classified unit costs, triggering a $100+ million replenishment contract — fundamentally changed the financial calculus of bunker buster investment in the United States. The parallel $120.8 million in FY2025 and $73.7 million in FY2026 for the NGP program confirm that the United States is now investing at a pace not seen since the original MOP development era, with both a current-generation restocking effort and a next-generation development program running simultaneously.

The combined picture of US bunker buster defense spending in 2026 — more than $173 million in active procurement and development commitments visible in public documents alone — reflects the elevated threat environment that Operation Midnight Hammer both responded to and reinforced. With Iran, North Korea, and China all continuing to expand and deepen their underground military and nuclear infrastructure, the United States has concluded that bunker buster capability is not a niche specialty but a core pillar of strategic deterrence. The FY2026 defense budget’s treatment of the NGP program as a near-term priority rather than a long-range research project underscores how fundamentally the events of June 2025 reshaped US bunker buster investment priorities heading into 2026 and beyond.

Disclaimer: This research report is compiled from publicly available sources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given as to the completeness or reliability of the information. We accept no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages of any kind arising from the use of this report.