1970 US Census
The 1970 US Census, conducted by the US Census Bureau, stands as a pivotal moment in American demographic history, capturing the nation at a time of profound social, political, and cultural transformation. Conducted on April 1, 1970, this 19th decennial census determined that the resident population of the United States totaled 203,392,031 people, representing an increase of 13.4% over the 179,323,175 persons enumerated during the 1960 Census. This marked the first time in American history that the nation’s population exceeded 200 million people, a milestone that symbolized the post-World War II baby boom era and the nation’s emergence as a global superpower. The 1970 Census captured America during the height of the Vietnam War, the civil rights movement, urban riots, and massive social change that would define the decade.
The 1970 US Census represented significant methodological innovations and changes from previous counts. It was the first census to use mail-out/mail-back questionnaires as the primary method of data collection in urban areas, reducing the need for door-to-door enumeration and setting a precedent for future censuses. The 1970 Census also marked several historic firsts: it was the first census since 1820 in which New York was not the most populous state, as California overtook it in January 1963 with its population reaching 19.95 million compared to New York’s 18.24 million. Additionally, all 50 states recorded populations exceeding 300,000 for the first time, and Houston became the first city in the geographic South to record a population over 1 million. The census revealed a median age of 28.1 years, down from 29.5 years in 1960, reflecting the youth-dominated demographics of the baby boom generation. The 1970 US Census data would shape federal policy, congressional apportionment, funding allocations, and understanding of American society throughout the decade.
Interesting Stats & Facts About 1970 US Census
| Key Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Total US Population (April 1, 1970) | 203,392,031 people |
| Population Increase from 1960 | 24,068,856 (+13.4%) |
| 1960 Census Population | 179,323,175 people |
| First Time Over 200 Million | Milestone reached in 1970 |
| Median Age | 28.1 years (down from 29.5 in 1960) |
| Most Populous State | California (19,953,134) |
| Second Most Populous State | New York (18,236,967) |
| Least Populous State | Alaska (302,173) |
| Number of States | 50 states (Alaska & Hawaii counted for 2nd time) |
| Census Day | April 1, 1970 |
| Total Households | Approximately 63 million households |
| Average Household Size | 3.1 persons per household |
| Census Tracts Established | Approximately 34,700 tracts nationwide |
| Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas | 238 SMSAs recognized |
| First State to Reach 20 Million | California exceeded 20 million shortly after census |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census of Population and Housing, National Archives
Analysis of 1970 US Census Statistics
The comprehensive results of the 1970 US Census revealed a nation in the midst of dramatic demographic transformation. The 13.4% population increase from 1960 to 1970, adding over 24 million people, represented robust growth though it marked a deceleration from the explosive 18.5% growth rate between 1950 and 1960. This slowdown reflected declining birth rates as the baby boom generation began to taper off, with fertility rates dropping from their 1957 peak of 3.77 children per woman to approximately 2.48 children per woman by 1970. The 1970 Census captured the nation near the end of the baby boom era, which officially concluded in 1964, and the demographic data revealed the massive cohort of young people this phenomenon had created. Approximately 40% of the US population was under age 25, creating unprecedented pressures on schools, universities, and the job market.
The geographic redistribution of the American population emerged as one of the most significant findings of the 1970 US Census. California’s ascension to the most populous state with 19.95 million residents symbolized the westward and southward population shifts that would define late twentieth-century America. The Sun Belt states of the South and West showed the strongest growth rates, with states like Florida, Texas, Arizona, and Nevada experiencing population increases of 20-40% or more during the 1960s. Florida’s population surged from 4.95 million in 1960 to 6.79 million in 1970, an increase of 37.1%. Arizona grew from 1.30 million to 1.77 million, a 36.1% increase. Meanwhile, older industrial states in the Northeast and Midwest showed much slower growth or even population stagnation in urban cores, foreshadowing the Rust Belt challenges that would intensify in subsequent decades. The 1970 Census revealed that 73.5% of Americans lived in urban areas, up from 69.9% in 1960, continuing the long-term trend of urbanization and suburbanization that transformed American settlement patterns.
1970 US Census Population by State
| State | 1970 Population | 1960 Population | Change | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | 19,953,134 | 15,717,204 | +4,235,930 | +26.9% |
| New York | 18,236,967 | 16,782,304 | +1,454,663 | +8.7% |
| Pennsylvania | 11,793,909 | 11,319,366 | +474,543 | +4.2% |
| Texas | 11,196,730 | 9,579,677 | +1,617,053 | +16.9% |
| Illinois | 11,113,976 | 10,081,158 | +1,032,818 | +10.2% |
| Ohio | 10,652,017 | 9,706,397 | +945,620 | +9.7% |
| Michigan | 8,875,083 | 7,823,194 | +1,051,889 | +13.4% |
| New Jersey | 7,168,164 | 6,066,782 | +1,101,382 | +18.2% |
| Florida | 6,789,443 | 4,951,560 | +1,837,883 | +37.1% |
| Massachusetts | 5,689,170 | 5,148,578 | +540,592 | +10.5% |
| Alaska | 302,173 | 226,167 | +76,006 | +33.6% |
| Wyoming | 332,416 | 330,066 | +2,350 | +0.7% |
| Vermont | 444,330 | 389,881 | +54,449 | +14.0% |
| Delaware | 548,104 | 446,292 | +101,812 | +22.8% |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Final Population Counts, National Archives
Geographic analysis of the 1970 US Census population by state reveals the dramatic westward population shift that characterized post-World War II America. California’s population of 19.95 million represented nearly 10% of the entire US population, and the state had added over 4.2 million residents during the 1960s, more than the total population of many smaller states. This growth stemmed from multiple factors: the defense and aerospace industries boom, expansion of higher education through the state university system, attractive climate, and the cultural appeal of California as the epicenter of counterculture and innovation. The state’s population would continue its meteoric rise, exceeding 20 million shortly after the census and reaching 23.67 million by 1980. New York, despite its 8.7% growth to 18.24 million people, lost its centuries-long position as the nation’s most populous state, a symbolic shift that reflected the declining dominance of the Northeast industrial corridor.
Texas demonstrated the Sun Belt phenomenon with 16.9% growth to 11.20 million residents, positioning itself as the fourth most populous state and foreshadowing its eventual rise to second place in future decades. The state’s growth was fueled by oil industry expansion, development of petrochemical industries along the Gulf Coast, growth of cities like Houston and Dallas as business centers, and increasing Latino immigration. Florida’s spectacular 37.1% growth to 6.79 million people made it one of the fastest-growing states, driven by retiree migration from northern states, tourism industry development, and the allure of year-round warm weather. The state’s population boom would accelerate in subsequent decades, making it one of the most populous states by the early 21st century. Meanwhile, traditional industrial powerhouses like Pennsylvania (+4.2%), Ohio (+9.7%), and Illinois (+10.2%) showed more modest growth, and cities like Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and St. Louis experienced population decline in their urban cores as suburbanization accelerated.
The 1970 Census revealed that 13 states had populations exceeding 5 million: California, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, New Jersey, Florida, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Indiana, and Missouri. At the other end of the spectrum, Alaska with 302,173 people and Wyoming with 332,416 remained the least populous states. Alaska, having achieved statehood only in 1959, showed robust 33.6% growth but from a small base. The census marked the first time all states exceeded 300,000 population, with Delaware at 548,104 and Nevada at 488,738 among the smallest. The regional distribution showed the West as the fastest-growing region, followed by the South, while the Northeast and Midwest grew more slowly. Urbanization patterns revealed that 73.5% of Americans lived in urban areas, with 31% living in central cities and 42.5% in suburbs, marking the continued rise of suburban living as the dominant American residential pattern.
Racial Composition in the 1970 US Census
| Racial Category | Population | Percentage of Total | 1960 Population | Change from 1960 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 177,748,975 | 87.5% | 158,831,732 | +18,917,243 (+11.9%) |
| Black or African American | 22,580,289 | 11.1% | 18,871,831 | +3,708,458 (+19.7%) |
| American Indian, Eskimo, and Aleut | 827,268 | 0.4% | 523,591 | +303,677 (+58.0%) |
| Asian and Pacific Islander | 1,538,721 | 0.8% | 980,337 | +558,384 (+56.9%) |
| Japanese | 591,290 | 0.3% | 464,332 | +126,958 |
| Chinese | 435,062 | 0.2% | 237,292 | +197,770 |
| Filipino | 343,060 | 0.2% | 176,310 | +166,750 |
| Other Races | 696,778 | 0.3% | 115,684 | +581,094 |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census General Population Characteristics, National Archives Records
The racial composition revealed by the 1970 US Census reflected both the continuation of long-standing demographic patterns and the beginning of significant changes that would transform America in subsequent decades. The White population comprised 87.5% of Americans at 177.75 million people, growing 11.9% from 1960 but at a slower rate than the overall population growth of 13.4%, indicating the beginning of demographic shifts that would make America more racially diverse over time. The White population remained overwhelmingly dominant in most regions, particularly the Midwest (90%+) and rural areas, though urban centers showed increasing diversity. The census methodology for racial classification in 1970 primarily relied on self-identification, though enumerators could assign race based on observation in some circumstances, creating some inconsistencies in racial data collection.
The Black or African American population totaled 22.58 million people or 11.1% of Americans, representing significant growth of 19.7% from 1960, faster than the overall population growth rate. This growth stemmed from high birth rates and declining mortality rates due to improving healthcare access and living conditions. The Black population remained heavily concentrated in the South (53% of all Black Americans) and major urban centers of the North and Midwest. The 1970 Census captured the Black population shortly after the peak of the civil rights movement and urban uprisings of the 1960s, which had drawn national attention to racial inequality and segregation. Major cities like Washington D.C. (71% Black), Atlanta (51% Black), Detroit (44% Black), Baltimore (46% Black), and Newark (54% Black) had become majority or near-majority Black as White flight to suburbs accelerated following riots and school desegregation. The Great Migration of Black Americans from the rural South to northern and western cities continued through 1970, though it was beginning to slow and would eventually reverse in subsequent decades.
The American Indian, Eskimo, and Aleut population showed remarkable 58.0% growth to 827,268 people, though this increase reflected both actual population growth and improved census enumeration methods on reservations and in urban areas where Native Americans had migrated. The 1970 Census represented growing recognition of Native American identity and activism, as the American Indian Movement (AIM) and other organizations drew attention to indigenous rights and sovereignty issues. The Asian and Pacific Islander population demonstrated similar robust growth at 56.9%, reaching 1.54 million people, driven primarily by immigration liberalization following the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, which eliminated discriminatory national-origin quotas. Japanese Americans (591,290) remained the largest Asian group, reflecting generations of settlement, but Chinese Americans (435,062) and Filipino Americans (343,060) showed rapid growth as immigration from Asia accelerated. The “Other Races” category, which grew to 696,778 people, included persons of mixed racial heritage and those not fitting standard racial categories, foreshadowing the multiracial identification that would become more prominent in future censuses.
Age Distribution in the 1970 US Census
| Age Group | Population | Percentage | Key Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 5 Years | 17,166,000 | 8.4% | Baby boom’s youngest children |
| 5-9 Years | 19,969,000 | 9.8% | Peak baby boom cohort |
| 10-14 Years | 20,804,000 | 10.2% | Largest age group |
| 15-19 Years | 19,084,000 | 9.4% | Teenagers/young adults |
| 20-24 Years | 16,383,000 | 8.1% | College age/early workforce |
| 25-34 Years | 24,907,000 | 12.2% | Early career/family formation |
| 35-44 Years | 22,872,000 | 11.2% | Middle career years |
| 45-54 Years | 23,225,000 | 11.4% | Peak earning years |
| 55-64 Years | 18,590,000 | 9.1% | Pre-retirement |
| 65 Years and Over | 20,066,000 | 9.9% | Elderly population |
| Median Age | 28.1 years | N/A | Down from 29.5 in 1960 |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Age Supplementary Reports, National Archives
The age distribution captured by the 1970 US Census dramatically illustrated the impact of the post-World War II baby boom on American demographics. The most striking feature was the enormous concentration of population in younger age groups, with approximately 40% of Americans under age 20 and nearly 60% under age 30. The 10-14 age group was the largest single cohort at 20.8 million people (10.2% of the population), representing children born during the peak baby boom years of 1956-1960 when annual births exceeded 4 million. The adjacent 5-9 and 15-19 age groups were nearly as large, creating a massive youth bulge that placed unprecedented demands on schools, created intense competition for college admissions and jobs, and fueled the youth-oriented culture of the 1960s including rock music, anti-war protests, and social movements.
The median age of 28.1 years represented a decline from 29.5 years in 1960 and 30.2 years in 1950, making America an exceptionally young nation by today’s standards. This youthfulness reflected the baby boom’s continuation through the early 1960s combined with declining mortality rates that kept more children and young adults alive. The under-5 population of 17.2 million was considerably smaller than the 5-14 age groups, reflecting declining birth rates as the baby boom ended, with births dropping from their 1957 peak of 4.3 million annually to approximately 3.7 million by 1970. The 20-24 age group of 16.4 million represented the oldest baby boomers entering adulthood, college, and the workforce, creating enormous pressure on higher education systems, entry-level job markets, and starting the cohort’s long-term influence on American society.
The working-age population (25-64 years) totaled approximately 89.6 million people or 44% of the population, a relatively small proportion compared to later decades due to the youth bulge. This created a favorable dependency ratio with many workers supporting relatively few retirees, though the large youth population required substantial investment in education and child-rearing. The 65 and over population totaled 20.1 million people or 9.9%, just below 10% for the first time in several censuses. This elderly population consisted primarily of individuals born before 1905, many of whom had immigrated to America during the great immigration waves of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Life expectancy in 1970 stood at approximately 70.8 years overall (67.1 for men, 74.7 for women), meaning the elderly population, while growing, remained a much smaller proportion of society than it would become as baby boomers aged. The age structure of 1970 represented the last gasp of America’s youthful demographic profile before birth rates fell permanently below replacement level and the nation began its long-term aging trend.
Urban and Rural Population in the 1970 US Census
| Residence Type | Population | Percentage | 1960 Population | Change from 1960 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Urban | 149,324,930 | 73.5% | 125,268,750 | +19.2% |
| Urbanized Areas | 118,447,290 | 58.2% | 95,848,000 | +23.6% |
| Inside Central Cities | 63,921,856 | 31.4% | 57,975,000 | +10.3% |
| Urban Fringe (Suburbs) | 54,525,434 | 26.8% | 37,873,000 | +44.0% |
| Other Urban | 30,877,640 | 15.2% | 29,420,750 | +5.0% |
| Total Rural | 53,886,996 | 26.5% | 54,054,425 | -0.3% |
| Rural Farm | 9,712,000 | 4.8% | 13,444,000 | -27.8% |
| Rural Nonfarm | 44,174,996 | 21.7% | 40,610,425 | +8.8% |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Urban and Rural Classifications, National Archives
The urban and rural distribution revealed by the 1970 US Census demonstrated the continuation and acceleration of suburbanization that became one of the defining demographic trends of post-World War II America. The urban population reached 149.3 million people or 73.5% of all Americans, up from 69.9% in 1960 and 64% in 1950, marking the United States as an overwhelmingly urban nation. However, the composition of this urban population had shifted dramatically from previous generations. Central cities grew only 10.3% to 63.9 million people, far below the overall population growth rate, while suburban areas exploded by 44.0% to 54.5 million people. This meant that by 1970, suburban residents comprised 26.8% of all Americans, approaching parity with central city dwellers at 31.4%, and suburbs accounted for the majority of urban population growth during the decade.
This suburban boom reflected multiple intersecting factors: massive highway construction following the 1956 Interstate Highway Act, which made commuting from suburbs to city jobs feasible; Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Administration mortgage programs that made homeownership accessible to middle-class families; the desire of White families to leave increasingly diverse and troubled urban cores; and developers like Levitt and Sons creating affordable planned suburban communities. The 1970 Census captured suburbanization at its peak intensity, with places like Levittown, New York, and similar developments nationwide representing the archetypal American lifestyle. States with major metropolitan areas showed the starkest suburban growth: California’s suburbs added millions of residents, while suburban counties surrounding New York City, Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, and other major metros experienced population explosions. Meanwhile, many central cities actually lost population or grew only marginally, particularly older industrial cities in the Northeast and Midwest. Detroit, St. Louis, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and Newark all experienced population decline during the 1960s, a harbinger of the urban crisis that would intensify in the 1970s and 1980s.
The rural population remained essentially flat at 53.9 million people (26.5% of the total), declining slightly by -0.3% in absolute numbers despite overall population growth. This marked the continuation of rural-to-urban migration that had characterized American demography since the late 19th century. However, the composition of rural America changed significantly. The farm population plummeted by 27.8% from 13.4 million in 1960 to just 9.7 million in 1970 (4.8% of all Americans), reflecting mechanization of agriculture, consolidation of farms into larger operations, and the economic unviability of small family farms. The 1970 Census marked a historic low point for farm population as a percentage of Americans—down from 23% in 1940 and 40% in 1900—symbolizing the transformation of America from an agricultural to an industrial and post-industrial economy. Conversely, the rural nonfarm population grew 8.8% to 44.2 million people, comprising 21.7% of Americans. This category included residents of small towns, villages, and dispersed settlements who did not live on farms, representing rural America’s transition from an agricultural to a more diverse economic base including manufacturing, mining, services, and retirement communities.
Housing Characteristics in the 1970 US Census
| Housing Characteristic | Number/Percentage | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Total Housing Units | 68,678,835 | All occupied and vacant units |
| Occupied Housing Units | 63,449,747 | 92.4% occupancy rate |
| Owner-Occupied Units | 39,885,785 | 62.9% of occupied units |
| Renter-Occupied Units | 23,563,962 | 37.1% of occupied units |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,229,088 | 7.6% of all units |
| Median Value (Owner-Occupied) | $17,000 | Median home value in 1970 |
| Median Contract Rent | $108 per month | Median monthly rent |
| Units with Complete Plumbing | 91.4% | Hot/cold water, bath, toilet |
| Units Lacking Plumbing | 5,446,000 (8.6%) | Substandard housing |
| Average Household Size | 3.1 persons | Down from 3.3 in 1960 |
| Single-Unit Structures | 76.8% | Detached and attached homes |
| Multi-Unit Structures | 23.2% | Apartments and condos |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Housing Characteristics, National Archives
Housing data from the 1970 US Census revealed the massive residential construction boom that accommodated America’s growing and increasingly suburban population. The total of 68.7 million housing units represented an increase of approximately 11.4 million units or 19.9% growth from 1960, slightly outpacing population growth and reflecting improving housing conditions and decreasing household sizes. The occupancy rate of 92.4% indicated relatively tight housing markets nationwide, with 5.2 million vacant units including seasonal properties, units for sale or rent, and abandoned structures particularly in declining urban neighborhoods. The homeownership rate of 62.9% reflected the success of postwar policies promoting homeownership and the suburban boom, representing a historic high that would persist through subsequent decades. Over 39.9 million households owned their homes, while 23.6 million rented, with ownership rates highest among White families, middle-aged adults, and suburban residents.
The median home value of $17,000 in 1970 dollars (equivalent to approximately $130,000-$140,000 in 2025 dollars) represented affordable homeownership by modern standards, with median values varying dramatically by region: expensive in California coastal areas and northeastern suburbs, moderate in Midwest and South, and lowest in rural areas and declining urban neighborhoods. The median contract rent of $108 monthly ($850-$900 in 2025 dollars) was similarly affordable, with rent typically consuming 15-20% of median household income compared to 25-35% or more in many markets by 2025. Regional variations were substantial, with New York City, San Francisco, and other expensive markets far exceeding national medians while small-town and rural rents could be half the national figure. Construction costs, land prices, and mortgage interest rates (typically 7-8% in 1970) enabled middle-class families to afford homeownership at levels difficult to replicate in later decades.
Housing quality showed marked improvement from previous decades but retained significant deficiencies. Approximately 91.4% of housing units had complete plumbing facilities (hot and cold piped water, bathtub or shower, and flush toilet), up from 84% in 1960, meaning 5.4 million units still lacked basic modern amenities. These substandard housing units concentrated in rural areas, particularly Appalachia and the rural South, and in deteriorating urban neighborhoods where poverty and disinvestment led to housing decay. The Appalachian region alone accounted for over 1 million units lacking complete plumbing. Additionally, many units lacked central heating, using wood or coal stoves, particularly in warmer climates and rural areas. Average household size of 3.1 persons reflected the baby boom’s impact, with many households including multiple children, though the figure was declining from 3.3 in 1960 as fertility rates dropped and more elderly individuals and young adults lived alone.
Educational Attainment in the 1970 US Census
| Educational Level | Population 25+ Years | Percentage | Comparison to 1960 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 5 Years of School | 6,181,000 | 5.5% | Down from 8.3% in 1960 |
| 5-8 Years (Elementary) | 20,729,000 | 18.5% | Down from 24.8% in 1960 |
| High School 1-3 Years | 20,015,000 | 17.9% | Similar to 1960 |
| High School 4 Years | 31,396,000 | 28.0% | Up from 24.6% in 1960 |
| College 1-3 Years | 15,990,000 | 14.3% | Up from 11.3% in 1960 |
| College 4 Years or More | 11,115,000 | 9.9% | Up from 7.7% in 1960 |
| Bachelor’s Degree or Higher | 11,115,000 | 9.9% | Up from 7.7% in 1960 |
| High School Graduates or Higher | 64,498,000 | 57.6% | Up from 41.1% in 1960 |
| Median Years of School | 12.1 years | N/A | Up from 10.6 in 1960 |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Educational Characteristics, National Archives
Educational attainment data from the 1970 US Census revealed dramatic improvements in American education levels as the high school diploma became the standard credential and college education expanded massively. Among adults aged 25 and older (totaling approximately 112 million people), 57.6% had completed high school, up from 41.1% in 1960, representing one of the fastest periods of educational advancement in American history. This improvement stemmed from multiple factors: state laws requiring school attendance through age 16 or 18; the GI Bill enabling millions of World War II and Korean War veterans to complete high school and college; economic prosperity making extended education financially viable; and societal recognition that education was essential for economic success in an increasingly complex economy. The median years of schooling completed reached 12.1 years, up from 10.6 years in 1960, meaning that for the first time, the typical American adult had completed high school.
College education expanded dramatically during the 1960s, with the 1970 Census capturing the results of massive higher education investment. Nearly 10% of adults (11.1 million people) held bachelor’s degrees or higher, up from 7.7% in 1960, representing a 44% increase in just one decade. An additional 16.0 million adults (14.3%) had completed some college without obtaining a degree, often attending community colleges or leaving four-year institutions before completion. Combined, over 27 million Americans (24.2% of adults) had some college education, reflecting the democratization of higher education through public university expansion, community college growth, and increased financial aid availability. The expansion of state university systems in California, New York, Texas, and other states, along with community college creation nationwide, made college accessible to middle-class and working-class families in ways previously impossible.
Educational disparities remained substantial across demographic lines. Men held college degrees at substantially higher rates than women, with approximately 13-14% of men holding bachelor’s degrees compared to 7-8% of women, reflecting traditional gender roles and limited career opportunities for women that discouraged college attendance. However, female college enrollment was rising rapidly by 1970, foreshadowing the eventual reversal where women would surpass men in educational attainment. Racial disparities were even more pronounced, with approximately 12-13% of White adults holding bachelor’s degrees compared to only 4-5% of Black adults, reflecting historical barriers including segregated and underfunded schools, economic disadvantage, and discrimination in college admissions. Urban residents had substantially higher educational attainment than rural residents, with college degrees concentrated in metropolitan areas while rural areas still had significant populations who had not completed elementary school. At the bottom of the educational ladder, approximately 6.2 million adults (5.5%) had completed less than five years of schooling, down from 8.3% in 1960 but still representing millions with extremely limited literacy and educational preparation, concentrated among the elderly, recent immigrants, and residents of impoverished rural areas.
Employment and Labor Force in the 1970 US Census
| Employment Characteristic | Number/Percentage | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Civilian Labor Force | 82,771,000 | Employed plus unemployed seeking work |
| Employed Persons | 78,678,000 | 95.1% employment rate |
| Unemployed Persons | 4,093,000 | 4.9% unemployment rate |
| Male Labor Force Participation | 79.7% | Men 16+ in labor force |
| Female Labor Force Participation | 43.3% | Women 16+ in labor force |
| White-Collar Workers | 38,308,000 | 48.7% of employed |
| Blue-Collar Workers | 27,791,000 | 35.3% of employed |
| Service Workers | 9,712,000 | 12.3% of employed |
| Farm Workers | 2,867,000 | 3.6% of employed |
| Median Family Income | $9,867 | In 1970 dollars |
| Families Below Poverty Line | 5,260,000 (10.1%) | Federal poverty threshold |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Employment and Labor Force Statistics, National Archives
Labor force characteristics from the 1970 US Census captured America at a moment of economic transition from industrial to post-industrial economy. The civilian labor force totaled 82.8 million people, representing approximately 61% of the civilian noninstitutional population aged 16 and older. The unemployment rate of 4.9% reflected a reasonably healthy economy, though unemployment had risen from 3.5% in 1969 as the economic expansion of the 1960s began to slow. Approximately 78.7 million people were employed across all sectors of the economy, with employment patterns showing the continuation of long-term structural shifts away from agriculture and manufacturing toward services and white-collar occupations. The 1970 labor market was characterized by relatively high wages for working-class jobs, strong union representation in manufacturing (approximately 27% of workers were union members), and the early stages of women’s mass entry into the paid workforce.
The male labor force participation rate of 79.7% represented a modest decline from 83.3% in 1960 and 86.4% in 1950, reflecting earlier retirement, longer education, and disability. Nearly 4 in 5 men aged 16 and older worked or sought work, with participation rates peaking at 95%+ for men aged 25-54. The female labor force participation rate of 43.3% represented a dramatic increase from 37.7% in 1960 and 33.9% in 1950, as women increasingly joined the paid workforce. By 1970, over 31 million women worked outside the home, driven by economic necessity, rising education levels, the women’s liberation movement, changing social attitudes about women’s roles, and the availability of labor-saving household technologies. Female participation rates were highest among young women before childbearing, women with college education, Black women (who had historically worked at higher rates than White women due to economic necessity), and women in urban areas. However, women faced significant wage discrimination, with median female earnings at approximately 59% of median male earnings, occupational segregation into “pink collar” jobs like teaching, nursing, and clerical work, and limited opportunities for advancement.
Occupational distribution showed that White-collar workers (professional, managerial, clerical, and sales workers) comprised 48.7% of employed persons at 38.3 million people, representing the largest occupational category for the first time in American history and marking the transition to a service and information economy. Professional and technical workers included teachers, engineers, accountants, nurses, and scientists, reflecting the growth of knowledge work. Managers and administrators ran businesses and organizations of increasing complexity. Clerical workers, dominated by women, performed the administrative tasks of modern offices, while sales workers distributed goods and services in an increasingly consumer-oriented economy. Blue-collar workers (craftsmen, operatives, and laborers) totaled 27.8 million or 35.3% of employment, down from over 40% in 1960, reflecting declining manufacturing employment as factories automated and relocated. Nonetheless, blue-collar jobs remained well-paying for workers with limited education, particularly in unionized industries like automobiles, steel, and machinery.
Service workers (12.3%, 9.7 million people) included janitors, food service workers, healthcare aides, personal service workers, and protective services, representing a growing sector that would expand dramatically in subsequent decades. Farm workers had declined to just 3.6% of employment (2.9 million people), down from 8.3% in 1960 and 17.4% in 1940, as mechanization, consolidation, and productivity improvements reduced agricultural labor needs despite increasing food production. The median family income of $9,867 (equivalent to approximately $76,000 in 2025 dollars) reflected relatively broad prosperity, though income inequality remained substantial. Approximately 5.3 million families (10.1%) lived below the poverty line, with poverty concentrated among Black families (29.5% poverty rate), families headed by single mothers, rural families, and the elderly. Despite overall prosperity, the 1970 Census revealed that approximately 25.4 million individuals lived in poverty, highlighting that economic growth had not reached all Americans.
Family and Household Structure in the 1970 US Census
| Household Type | Number of Households | Percentage | Average Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Households | 63,449,747 | 100% | 3.1 persons |
| Family Households | 51,456,000 | 81.2% | 3.6 persons |
| Married-Couple Families | 44,755,000 | 70.5% | 3.7 persons |
| Female-Headed Families | 5,500,000 | 8.7% | 3.3 persons |
| Male-Headed Families | 1,201,000 | 1.9% | 3.1 persons |
| Non-Family Households | 11,994,000 | 18.9% | 1.2 persons |
| Single-Person Households | 10,851,000 | 17.1% | 1.0 person |
| Households with Children Under 18 | 31,022,000 | 48.9% | N/A |
| Average Family Size | 3.6 persons | N/A | Down from 3.7 in 1960 |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Families and Household Composition, National Archives
Family and household structure data from the 1970 US Census revealed a nation where traditional nuclear families remained dominant but were beginning to show signs of the diversification that would accelerate in subsequent decades. The total of 63.4 million households represented a 20% increase from 1960, growing faster than the population due to declining household sizes and increasing numbers of individuals living alone or in non-family arrangements. Family households (two or more related individuals) comprised 81.2% of all households at 51.5 million, with the remainder being non-family households including people living alone, unrelated roommates, or unmarried couples. The dominance of family households reflected the social norms of 1970, when marriage and childbearing remained nearly universal life experiences and alternative living arrangements faced social stigma and legal barriers.
Married-couple families represented 70.5% of all households at 44.8 million, making them by far the most common household type. These families averaged 3.7 persons, typically including both spouses and children, though many included adult children or other relatives. The married-couple family represented the American ideal celebrated in popular culture, government policy, and social expectations, enjoying tax advantages, social acceptance, and economic security. However, this dominance was beginning to erode, down from 74.3% of households in 1960, as divorce rates rose, more people delayed or forgone marriage, and alternative lifestyles gained limited acceptance. The female-headed family (woman with children or other relatives, no husband present) comprised 8.7% of households at 5.5 million, representing a 30% increase from 1960. These households faced significant economic hardship, with poverty rates exceeding 30%, as women earned substantially less than men and childcare responsibilities limited employment opportunities. The rise in female-headed families reflected increasing divorce rates, rising non-marital childbearing, and declining remarriage rates.
Single-person households grew to 10.9 million (17.1% of all households), up from 13% in 1960, representing one of the fastest-growing household types. This increase reflected multiple trends: young adults delaying marriage, increasing divorce with divorced individuals living alone, elderly widows and widowers (particularly women, who outnumbered men at older ages), and urban singles choosing independent living. Geographic patterns showed single-person households concentrated in major cities like New York, San Francisco, and Chicago, while family households dominated suburbs and rural areas. The average household size of 3.1 persons was declining from 3.3 in 1960 and 3.4 in 1950, driven by falling fertility rates, smaller families, and increasing numbers of elderly individuals and young adults living alone. Nearly half of all households (48.9% or 31.0 million) included children under 18, down from 56% in 1960, as the baby boom ended and childless households became more common.
The 1970 Census captured families shortly before dramatic changes in family structure would accelerate. Divorce rates were rising rapidly, doubling during the 1960s and poised to double again in the 1970s as states adopted no-fault divorce laws. Non-marital cohabitation remained rare and socially unacceptable in 1970 but would explode in subsequent decades. Same-sex couples were invisible in census data, as such relationships were illegal in most states and carried severe social stigma. The traditional male-breadwinner family was eroding as more married women entered the workforce, with 40% of married women working in 1970 compared to 30% in 1960. Fertility patterns showed stark class differences, with college-educated women having fewer children and delaying childbearing while less-educated women had more children at younger ages, patterns that would widen in future decades.
Geographic Mobility and Migration in the 1970 US Census
| Migration Pattern | Number/Percentage | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Same Residence as 1965 | 52.4% | No move in 5 years |
| Different Residence | 47.6% | Moved between 1965-1970 |
| Same County Movers | 25.6% | Local moves |
| Different County, Same State | 10.9% | Intrastate migration |
| Different State | 8.7% | Interstate migration |
| Abroad in 1965 | 2.4% | Immigrants |
| Moved from Central Cities to Suburbs | Millions | White flight |
| Moved from Rural to Urban Areas | Millions | Urbanization |
| Regional Growth Leaders | West (+24%), South (+14%) | Sunbelt migration |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Mobility and Migration Data, National Archives
Geographic mobility data from the 1970 US Census demonstrated that America remained a highly mobile society, with nearly half the population (47.6%) having changed residences between 1965 and 1970. This high mobility reflected the restless, dynamic character of American society, where economic opportunities, housing preferences, family circumstances, and lifestyle choices prompted frequent relocation. Most moves (25.6% of the population) occurred within the same county, representing local housing upgrades, life stage transitions (college students, young families, retirees), or responses to neighborhood change. These local moves were particularly common in metropolitan areas, where individuals moved from apartments to houses, from smaller to larger homes, or from urban neighborhoods to suburbs. Interstate migration (8.7% of the population or approximately 17.7 million people) represented one of the highest levels in American history, reflecting the massive westward and southward population shifts documented in state-level data.
The dominant migration pattern of the 1960s, captured in the 1970 Census, was suburbanization and White flight from central cities to suburban rings. Millions of White families relocated from urban cores to newly developed suburban communities, driven by push factors (urban crime, racial integration of neighborhoods and schools, deteriorating housing stock, industrial pollution) and pull factors (new affordable housing, better schools, larger lots, racial homogeneity, automobile-oriented lifestyle). This exodus devastated many urban neighborhoods and tax bases while fueling explosive suburban growth. Metropolitan areas like Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Newark lost hundreds of thousands of White residents to suburbs during the 1960s, while their Black populations grew through continued Great Migration from the South and higher birth rates, creating increasingly segregated metropolitan regions. Suburbs were overwhelmingly White in 1970 (95%+ in most suburbs), as racial discrimination in housing through redlining, restrictive covenants (recently outlawed), and realtor steering prevented Black families from following Whites to suburbs.
Regional migration patterns showed dramatic movement from the Northeast and Midwest to the South and West, foreshadowing the Sunbelt phenomenon that would intensify in the 1970s and 1980s. The West region grew 24% during the 1960s, led by California’s explosive expansion but also including strong growth in Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, and Washington. Migration to the West was motivated by economic opportunities in defense, aerospace, technology, and entertainment industries; attractive climate; natural amenities; and the psychological appeal of new frontiers and lifestyles. The South grew 14%, rebounding from decades of out-migration as air conditioning made the region’s climate tolerable, economic development created jobs, racial attitudes slowly improved, and retirees discovered Florida and other warm destinations. Florida alone attracted hundreds of thousands of retirees from northern states, transforming the state’s demographics and economy.
Rural-to-urban migration continued but at slower rates than previous decades, as most Americans already lived in metropolitan areas by 1970. The Black Great Migration from the rural South to northern and western cities continued, though it was slowing and would reverse in future decades as the South’s economy improved and northern cities deteriorated. Approximately 500,000-750,000 Black southerners migrated north or west during the 1960s, far fewer than the 1.5-2.0 million who migrated in the 1940s or 1950s. Young adults showed the highest mobility, with college students, military personnel, and those beginning careers particularly likely to move across state lines. The 1970 Census captured migration near the end of Vietnam War-era draft, which scattered hundreds of thousands of young men to military bases nationwide and internationally. International immigration remained relatively low in 1970, with just 2.4% of the population living abroad in 1965, as the effects of the 1965 Immigration Act were just beginning and immigration quotas remained restrictive compared to later decades.
Housing Costs and Economic Conditions in the 1970 US Census
| Economic Indicator | 1970 Figure | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Median Family Income | $9,867 | Equivalent to ~$76,000 in 2025 dollars |
| Median Male Earnings | $6,670 | Full-time workers |
| Median Female Earnings | $3,940 | Full-time workers (59% of male) |
| Median Home Value | $17,000 | Owner-occupied homes |
| Median Gross Rent | $108/month | Contract rent plus utilities |
| Poverty Rate (Families) | 10.1% | 5.3 million families |
| Poverty Rate (Individuals) | 12.6% | 25.4 million people |
| Home Price to Income Ratio | ~1.7:1 | Much lower than 2025 (3-5:1) |
| Rent Burden | 15-18% of income | Lower than 2025 (25-35%+) |
Data Source: US Census Bureau 1970 Census Income and Housing Cost Data, National Archives
Economic conditions and housing affordability captured in the 1970 US Census revealed an America where middle-class homeownership and economic security were accessible to a much broader swath of the population than in later decades. The median family income of $9,867 in 1970 dollars (approximately $76,000 in 2025 purchasing power) supported a comfortable middle-class lifestyle for many families, with single-earner households common and dual-income families able to achieve considerable prosperity. However, these averages masked substantial inequality by race, gender, education, and geography. White families had median incomes around $10,236, while Black families earned just $6,516 (64% of White income), and Hispanic families earned approximately $7,108. College-educated professionals earned substantially more, while high school dropouts, farm workers, and service workers often lived in or near poverty.
The wage gap by gender was stark, with median earnings for full-time, year-round workers at $6,670 for men compared to just $3,940 for women, meaning women earned approximately 59% of male earnings. This gap reflected occupational segregation (women concentrated in lower-paying teaching, nursing, clerical, and service jobs), outright discrimination (women paid less than men for the same work), and limited opportunities for advancement into management and professional roles. College-educated women earned more than non-college women but still substantially less than college-educated men. Black men earned approximately 66% of White male earnings at $4,400 median, while Black women earned 74% of White female earnings at $2,900, meaning Black women faced the double burden of racial and gender discrimination. These wage gaps would persist and in some cases worsen before civil rights enforcement and social change gradually narrowed them.
Housing affordability in 1970 was dramatically better than in 2025, with the median home value of $17,000 representing approximately 1.7 times median family income, compared to 3-5 times or more in many 2025 markets. This meant a family earning median income could afford a median-priced home with a 20% down payment ($3,400) and mortgage payments consuming approximately 15-20% of income, manageable for most families. Regional variation was substantial, with California homes averaging $24,000-$26,000, northeastern suburbs $20,000-$25,000, southern and midwestern homes $15,000-$18,000, and rural homes $10,000-$12,000. The median rent of $108 monthly ($850-$900 in 2025 dollars) was similarly affordable, typically consuming 15-18% of renter income compared to 25-35% or more in 2025. This affordability enabled young families to buy homes, workers without college degrees to afford housing on single incomes, and renters to save for homeownership.
Despite overall prosperity, the 1970 Census documented significant poverty affecting over 25 million Americans (12.6% of the population). The poverty rate had fallen dramatically during the 1960s from 22.4% in 1959, reflecting the economic growth of the era and the impact of War on Poverty programs including Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, and increased Social Security benefits. However, poverty remained concentrated among certain groups: Black Americans (33.5% poverty rate), Hispanic Americans (~24% poverty rate), families headed by single mothers (~38% poverty rate), the elderly (~25% poverty rate), and residents of Appalachia and the rural South. Urban poverty increased during the 1960s as industrial jobs left cities, creating concentrated poverty in inner-city neighborhoods. Rural poverty remained pervasive in agricultural areas, Native American reservations, and mining regions. Child poverty affected approximately 15% of children, setting many on trajectories of limited opportunity and intergenerational poverty.
The 1970 US Census captured America at a pivotal demographic moment whose implications would unfold over subsequent decades. The youth bulge created by the baby boom would drive social change through the 1970s and 1980s as this enormous cohort moved through young adulthood, career formation, and family building, creating intense competition for jobs and housing while their sheer numbers gave them cultural and political influence. As these baby boomers aged into the 21st century, they would strain Social Security, Medicare, and healthcare systems, fundamentally challenging the sustainability of America’s social safety net. The median age of 28.1 years in 1970 represented the last gasp of American youth before birth rates fell permanently below replacement level and the nation began its inexorable aging. By 2025, the median age would reach 38.9 years, and projections suggest it will exceed 40 years by 2030-2035 as baby boomers fully enter elderhood and younger generations remain small due to low fertility.
The demographic trends visible in the 1970 Census—declining birth rates, increasing diversity through immigration, suburbanization, women’s labor force entry, changing family structures, and regional population shifts—would accelerate in subsequent decades, transforming America in ways barely imaginable in 1970. The White population’s 87.5% majority would shrink to 57.5% by 2025 and is projected to fall below 50% by 2045. The suburban dominance established by 1970 would evolve into sprawling metropolitan regions consuming farmland and natural areas. Women’s labor force participation would soar from 43% to 57% by 2025, fundamentally altering family economics, gender roles, and workplace dynamics. Family structure would diversify dramatically, with married-couple households falling from 70.5% in 1970 to 48% by 2025 as divorce, cohabitation, single-parenthood, and living alone became common. The 1970 US Census thus provides an invaluable baseline for understanding the demographic revolution that reshaped America over the subsequent half-century, documenting a nation that in many ways seems as distant and foreign as a different country when viewed from 2025.
Disclaimer: This research report is compiled from publicly available sources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given as to the completeness or reliability of the information. We accept no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages of any kind arising from the use of this report.

